iShares Global Clean Energy ETF vs Northrop Grumman Corporation — how do they compare? iShares Global Clean Energy ETF trades at $17.23 (market cap $2.27B), while Northrop Grumman Corporation trades at $480.11 (market cap $68.83B). The key difference: Northrop Grumman Corporation is far larger — about 30.3× iShares Global Clean Energy ETF's market cap, and Northrop Grumman Corporation pays a 2.04% dividend while iShares Global Clean Energy ETF pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold iShares Global Clean Energy ETF for 87 Days and Northrop Grumman Corporation for 81 Days on average.
| ICLN | NOC | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $2.27B | $68.83B |
Volume | 6,845,064 | 1,081,989 |
52-Week High | $23.75 | $768.02 |
52-Week Low | $15.78 | $473.46 |
Typical Hold Time | 87 Days | 81 Days |
Sector | — | Industrials |
Enterprise Value | — | $82.81B |
Dividend Yield | — | 2.04% |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
ICLN trades at $17.31, down 1.31% today, with a bearish technical signal from moving averages and neutral oscillators. The ETF's financial ratios are unavailable in the provided data, but recent news highlights its focus on global clean energy with 105 holdings and a 0.38% expense ratio. It faces volatility, with a 57.2% maximum drawdown noted in comparisons against traditional energy ETFs.
The outlook for ICLN is mixed; geopolitical tensions and global renewable energy investments provide tailwinds, but high volatility and competition from fossil fuel ETFs pose risks. Investors should weigh its growth potential against expense ratios and performance consistency in the evolving energy sector.
Northrop Grumman (NOC) trades at $473.46, down 2.0% on the day, reflecting a bearish technical signal amid recent contract loss news. The stock exhibits strong fundamentals with a P/E of 15.05, net income margin of 10.48%, and consistent earnings beats in recent quarters. Revenue growth is steady, supported by a record backlog, though the loss of the $20 billion Navy F/A-XX contract to Boeing introduces competitive pressure.
The outlook remains supported by robust defense budgets and key programs like the B-21 bomber, but investor sentiment is cautious near-term. Analyst consensus is bullish with a $600.62 price target, though technical indicators suggest potential near-term weakness. Risks include contract dependencies and macroeconomic shifts in defense spending.
Trailing returns across standard periods
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Latest headlines on both assets
The index is designed to track the performance of approximately 100 clean energy-related companies. The fund generally invests at least 80% of its assets in the component securities of the target index. The index may invest up to 20% of its assets in certain futures, trading options and swap contracts, cash and cash equivalents, as well as in securities not included in the index. It is non-diversified.
Read more on ICLN →Northrop Grumman is a defense contractor that is diversified across short-cycle and long-cycle businesses. The firm's segments include aeronautics, mission systems, defense services, and space systems. The company's aerospace segment creates the fuselage for the massive F-35 program and produces various piloted and autonomous flight systems. Mission systems creates a variety of sensors and processors for defense hardware. The defense systems segment is a long-range missile manufacturer. Finally, the company's space systems segment produces various space structures, sensors, and satellites.
Read more on NOC →