Investment
Features
FeesSafety
Academy
More
Pluang+

Compare iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) vs Monster Beverage Corp (MNST) Price & Performance

iShares Global Clean Energy ETFTrade
Monster Beverage CorpTrade

Price performance (Past 24H)

Key statistics

iShares Global Clean Energy ETF vs Monster Beverage Corp — how do they compare? iShares Global Clean Energy ETF trades at $17.28 (market cap $2.27B), while Monster Beverage Corp trades at $43.66 (market cap $85.51B). The key difference: Monster Beverage Corp is far larger — about 37.7× iShares Global Clean Energy ETF's market cap, and Monster Beverage Corp is trading nearer its 52-week high, iShares Global Clean Energy ETF nearer its low. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold iShares Global Clean Energy ETF for 87 Days and Monster Beverage Corp for 72 Days on average.

ICLNMNST
Market Cap
$2.27B$85.51B
Volume
6,845,0648,569,709
52-Week High
$23.75$49.97
52-Week Low
$15.78$33.16
Typical Hold Time
87 Days72 Days
Sector
—Consumer Staples
Enterprise Value
—$83.81B

Aura AI Summary

Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice

iShares Global Clean Energy ETF

ICLN trades at $17.25, down 0.35% with a bearish technical signal from moving averages. The ETF shows neutral momentum oscillators with RSI at 52.71 and 38.71. Recent news highlights ICLN's higher volatility and expense ratio compared to traditional energy ETFs, though geopolitical tensions and data center demand provide tailwinds for clean energy adoption.

The outlook remains challenged by competitive pressure from higher-yielding energy alternatives and significant historical drawdowns. However, global renewable energy acceleration and China's EV targets offer long-term growth potential. Key risks include fee structure disadvantages and sector volatility.

Monster Beverage Corp

Monster Beverage (MNST) trades at $43.58, up 1.63% on the day, with a bullish technical signal from moving averages. The company reported strong Q2 2026 earnings, beating estimates with EPS of $0.30, and maintains robust profitability with a net margin of 23.08% and zero long-term debt. Recent news highlights international sales growth of 35% in Q2 and a 1:2 stock split effective August 2026.

Outlook remains positive with a consensus price target of $98.22, implying significant upside, supported by international expansion and a debt-free balance sheet. Risks include competitive pressures, regulatory challenges in markets like India, and rich valuation multiples such as a P/E of 40.42. Analyst consensus is bullish with 52% buy ratings.

Returns comparison

Trailing returns across standard periods

Investor sentiment on Pluang

What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days

ICLN
100% Buy0% Sell
Avg holding period · 87 Days
MNST
0% Buy100% Sell
Avg holding period · 72 Days

Top news

Latest headlines on both assets

About iShares Global Clean Energy ETF

The index is designed to track the performance of approximately 100 clean energy-related companies. The fund generally invests at least 80% of its assets in the component securities of the target index. The index may invest up to 20% of its assets in certain futures, trading options and swap contracts, cash and cash equivalents, as well as in securities not included in the index. It is non-diversified.

Read more on ICLN →

About Monster Beverage Corp

Monster Beverage is a leader in the energy drink subsegment of the beverage industry. The Monster trademark anchors the portfolio, and notable offerings include Monster Energy and Monster Ultra. The firm has also started to incubate new trademarks for emerging enclaves of the energy space, like Reign in performance energy. It is primarily a brand owner, outsourcing most of its manufacturing processes to third-party copackers. It primarily uses the Coca-Cola bottling system for distribution after a strategic agreement in which Coke became Monster's largest shareholder (nearly 20%) and that also included the exchange of certain businesses between the two firms. Most of Monster's revenue is generated in the United States, though international geographies are increasing in the mix.

Read more on MNST →