iShares Global Clean Energy ETF vs Kinder Morgan Inc — how do they compare? iShares Global Clean Energy ETF trades at $17.23 (market cap $2.27B), while Kinder Morgan Inc trades at $32.23 (market cap $71.81B). The key difference: Kinder Morgan Inc is far larger — about 31.6× iShares Global Clean Energy ETF's market cap, and Kinder Morgan Inc pays a 3.66% dividend while iShares Global Clean Energy ETF pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold iShares Global Clean Energy ETF for 87 Days and Kinder Morgan Inc for 150 Days on average.
| ICLN | KMI | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $2.27B | $71.81B |
Volume | 6,845,064 | 16,921,908 |
52-Week High | $23.75 | $34.31 |
52-Week Low | $15.78 | $25.84 |
Typical Hold Time | 87 Days | 150 Days |
Sector | — | Energy |
Enterprise Value | — | $103.86B |
Dividend Yield | — | 3.66% |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
ICLN trades at $17.31, down 1.31% today, with a bearish technical signal from moving averages and neutral oscillators. The ETF's financial ratios are unavailable in the provided data, but recent news highlights its focus on global clean energy with 105 holdings and a 0.38% expense ratio. It faces volatility, with a 57.2% maximum drawdown noted in comparisons against traditional energy ETFs.
The outlook for ICLN is mixed; geopolitical tensions and global renewable energy investments provide tailwinds, but high volatility and competition from fossil fuel ETFs pose risks. Investors should weigh its growth potential against expense ratios and performance consistency in the evolving energy sector.
Kinder Morgan (KMI) trades at $31.82, down 1.06% today, with a bullish technical signal and strong fundamental performance. The company has beaten earnings estimates for three consecutive quarters, showing revenue growth from $15.1B in 2024 to $16.9B in 2025, with net income rising to $3.06B. Analyst consensus targets $37.20, suggesting 17% upside potential, supported by a $10B project backlog and growing natural gas demand from LNG exports and data centers.
KMI presents a compelling investment case with stable fee-based revenues, dividend yield, and growth opportunities in energy infrastructure. Key risks include energy market volatility, high debt levels ($29.66B long-term debt), and interest rate sensitivity. The stock offers value with reasonable valuation multiples (P/E 20.53, P/S 3.94) and positive analyst sentiment despite competitive pressures in the midstream sector.
Trailing returns across standard periods
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Latest headlines on both assets
The index is designed to track the performance of approximately 100 clean energy-related companies. The fund generally invests at least 80% of its assets in the component securities of the target index. The index may invest up to 20% of its assets in certain futures, trading options and swap contracts, cash and cash equivalents, as well as in securities not included in the index. It is non-diversified.
Read more on ICLN →Kinder Morgan is one of the largest midstream energy firms in North America, with an interest in or an operator on about 83,000 miles in pipelines and over 140 storage terminals. The company is active in the transportation, storage, and processing of natural gas, crude oil, refined products, natural gas liquids, and carbon dioxide. The majority of Kinder Morgan's cash flows stem from fee-based contracts for handling, moving, and storing fossil fuel products.
Read more on KMI →