Investment
Features
FeesSafety
Academy
More
Pluang+

Compare Icl Group Ltd (ICL) vs Materials Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLB) Price & Performance

Icl Group LtdTrade
Materials Select Sector SPDR FundTrade

Price performance (Past 24H)

Key statistics

Icl Group Ltd vs Materials Select Sector SPDR Fund — how do they compare? Icl Group Ltd trades at $5.02 (market cap $6.47B), while Materials Select Sector SPDR Fund trades at $49.43 (market cap $7.73B). The key difference: Materials Select Sector SPDR Fund is the larger of the two by market cap, and Icl Group Ltd pays a 4.11% dividend while Materials Select Sector SPDR Fund pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Icl Group Ltd for 56 Days and Materials Select Sector SPDR Fund for 70 Days on average.

ICLXLB
Market Cap
$6.47B$7.73B
Volume
1,387,14013,681,146
Sector
Basic Materials—
52-Week High
$6.84$53.67
52-Week Low
$4.80$42.23
Typical Hold Time
56 Days70 Days
Enterprise Value
$9.11B—
Dividend Yield
4.11%—

Aura AI Summary

Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice

Icl Group Ltd

ICL trades at $5.00, down 1.57% today, with a bearish technical signal from moving averages but a neutral oscillator stance. Recent earnings beat estimates in Q1 and Q2 2026, though revenue and net income have trended lower from 2022 peaks. The company maintains a dividend, with a $0.06 payment scheduled for September 2026, and operates with stable cash flow from operations around $1.1 billion.

The outlook is mixed: valuation ratios like P/E of 20.83 and P/S of 0.84 suggest reasonable pricing, but analyst consensus is entirely Hold with a $6.08 target. Risks include industry headwinds from higher input costs and competitive pressures, while institutional buying, like Amundi's Q1 2026 purchase, offers support. Earnings growth and cost transformation are key to upside.

Materials Select Sector SPDR Fund

XLB trades at $49.27 with a slight 0.59% daily gain, though technical indicators signal bearish momentum with moving averages and ADX pointing lower. The materials ETF faces headwinds from sector concentration risks, with chemicals comprising 49% of assets and top 10 holdings at 59% exposure. Recent analysis suggests much of the cyclical recovery appears priced in, limiting near-term upside potential despite infrastructure and manufacturing tailwinds.

The outlook remains cautious with technical weakness outweighing fundamental support. Investment opportunity exists in long-term materials exposure through efficient, low-cost ETF structure, but risks include sector concentration, cyclical pressures, and competition from AI-focused investments. Current levels near key support at $48-$49 require monitoring for potential breakdown.

Returns comparison

Trailing returns across standard periods

About Icl Group Ltd

ICL Group Ltd is a manufacturer of products based on minerals. The firm is comprised of four segments: phosphate solutions, potash, industrial products, and innovative agriculture solutions (IAS). These segments all contribute to the company's development of agriculture, food, and engineered material products and services. The company mines and manufactures potash and phosphates to be used as ingredients in fertilizers and serve as a component in the pharmaceutical and food additives industries. It is also engaged in industrial additives and materials, including flame retardants, phosphate salts, specialty phosphate blends, purified phosphoric acid, electronic-grade specialty phosphoric acids. Its geographical segments are Europe, Asia, North & South America, and the Rest of the world.

Read more on ICL →

About Materials Select Sector SPDR Fund

In seeking to track the performance of the index, the fund employs a replication strategy. It generally invests substantially all, but at least 95%, of its total assets in the securities comprising the index. The index includes securities of companies from the following industries: chemicals; metals and mining; paper and forest products; containers and packaging; and construction materials. The fund is non-diversified.

Read more on XLB →