Icl Group Ltd vs Monster Beverage Corp — how do they compare? Icl Group Ltd trades at $5.45 (market cap $6.94B), while Monster Beverage Corp trades at $45.62 (market cap $89.20B). The key difference: Monster Beverage Corp is far larger — about 12.9× Icl Group Ltd's market cap, and Icl Group Ltd pays a 3.86% dividend while Monster Beverage Corp pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| ICL | MNST | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $6.94B | $89.20B |
Sector | Basic Materials | Consumer Staples |
52-Week High | $6.84 | $49.97 |
52-Week Low | $4.80 | $30.86 |
Enterprise Value | $9.58B | $87.49B |
Dividend Yield | 3.86% | — |
Trailing returns across standard periods
Latest headlines on both assets
ICL Group Ltd is a manufacturer of products based on minerals. The firm is comprised of four segments: phosphate solutions, potash, industrial products, and innovative agriculture solutions (IAS). These segments all contribute to the company's development of agriculture, food, and engineered material products and services. The company mines and manufactures potash and phosphates to be used as ingredients in fertilizers and serve as a component in the pharmaceutical and food additives industries. It is also engaged in industrial additives and materials, including flame retardants, phosphate salts, specialty phosphate blends, purified phosphoric acid, electronic-grade specialty phosphoric acids. Its geographical segments are Europe, Asia, North & South America, and the Rest of the world.
Read more on ICL →Monster Beverage is a leader in the energy drink subsegment of the beverage industry. The Monster trademark anchors the portfolio, and notable offerings include Monster Energy and Monster Ultra. The firm has also started to incubate new trademarks for emerging enclaves of the energy space, like Reign in performance energy. It is primarily a brand owner, outsourcing most of its manufacturing processes to third-party copackers. It primarily uses the Coca-Cola bottling system for distribution after a strategic agreement in which Coke became Monster's largest shareholder (nearly 20%) and that also included the exchange of certain businesses between the two firms. Most of Monster's revenue is generated in the United States, though international geographies are increasing in the mix.
Read more on MNST →