Icl Group Ltd vs iShares Global Clean Energy ETF — how do they compare? Icl Group Ltd trades at $5.04 (market cap $6.47B), while iShares Global Clean Energy ETF trades at $17.19 (market cap $2.27B). The key difference: Icl Group Ltd is far larger — about 2.9× iShares Global Clean Energy ETF's market cap, and Icl Group Ltd pays a 4.11% dividend while iShares Global Clean Energy ETF pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Icl Group Ltd for 56 Days and iShares Global Clean Energy ETF for 87 Days on average.
| ICL | ICLN | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $6.47B | $2.27B |
Volume | 1,387,140 | 6,845,064 |
Sector | Basic Materials | — |
52-Week High | $6.84 | $23.75 |
52-Week Low | $4.80 | $15.78 |
Typical Hold Time | 56 Days | 87 Days |
Enterprise Value | $9.11B | — |
Dividend Yield | 4.11% | — |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
ICL trades at $5.08 with no recent price movement. The stock shows mixed technical signals with a bearish overall trend but neutral oscillators. Fundamentally, the company reported $7.15B revenue in 2025 with a 3.95% net margin, while valuation ratios appear reasonable with P/E of 20.83 and P/S of 0.84. Recent earnings showed Q2 2026 beat expectations with $0.12 EPS versus $0.11 expected. The company maintains stable cash flow generation despite recent net cash outflows.
ICL presents a cautious opportunity with 19.7% upside to the $6.08 consensus price target, though analyst sentiment is neutral with 100% hold ratings. Key risks include fertilizer industry headwinds from higher input costs and competitive pressures. The dividend yield of approximately 1.2% provides income support while investors await earnings recovery toward projected 2026 profitability improvement.
ICLN trades at $17.17, down 0.81% with bearish technical signals from moving averages. The ETF shows neutral momentum oscillators but faces significant volatility compared to traditional energy peers. Recent news highlights ICLN's 57.2% maximum drawdown and higher expense ratio of 0.38% versus fossil fuel ETFs, though geopolitical tensions are driving renewed interest in renewable energy infrastructure.
The clean energy sector faces competitive pressure from higher-yielding traditional energy ETFs, but long-term growth prospects remain supported by global energy transition trends. Key risks include expense ratio disadvantages and sector volatility, while potential catalysts include increased renewable adoption driven by geopolitical and environmental factors.
Trailing returns across standard periods
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
ICL Group Ltd is a manufacturer of products based on minerals. The firm is comprised of four segments: phosphate solutions, potash, industrial products, and innovative agriculture solutions (IAS). These segments all contribute to the company's development of agriculture, food, and engineered material products and services. The company mines and manufactures potash and phosphates to be used as ingredients in fertilizers and serve as a component in the pharmaceutical and food additives industries. It is also engaged in industrial additives and materials, including flame retardants, phosphate salts, specialty phosphate blends, purified phosphoric acid, electronic-grade specialty phosphoric acids. Its geographical segments are Europe, Asia, North & South America, and the Rest of the world.
Read more on ICL →The index is designed to track the performance of approximately 100 clean energy-related companies. The fund generally invests at least 80% of its assets in the component securities of the target index. The index may invest up to 20% of its assets in certain futures, trading options and swap contracts, cash and cash equivalents, as well as in securities not included in the index. It is non-diversified.
Read more on ICLN →