Investment
Features
FeesSafety
Academy
More
Pluang+

Compare Humana Inc (HUM) vs Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) Price & Performance

Humana IncTrade
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETFTrade

Price performance (Past 24H)

Key statistics

Humana Inc vs Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF — how do they compare? Humana Inc trades at $372.16 (market cap $44.77B), while Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF trades at $297.95. The key difference: Humana Inc pays a 0.95% dividend while Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.

HUMQQQM
Market Cap
$44.77B
Sector
HealthBroad Market / Factor
52-Week High
$409.42$307.23
52-Week Low
$163.67$229.87
Enterprise Value
$52.12B
Dividend Yield
0.95%

Returns comparison

Trailing returns across standard periods

Top news

Latest headlines on both assets

About Humana Inc

Humana is one of the largest private health insurers in the U.S. with a focus on administering Medicare Advantage plans. The firm has built a niche specializing in government-sponsored programs, with nearly all its medical membership stemming from individual and group Medicare Advantage, Medicaid, and the military's Tricare program. The firm is also a leader in stand-alone prescription drug plans for seniors enrolled in traditional fee-for-service Medicare. Humana offers employer-based plans primarily for small businesses along with specialty insurance offerings such as dental, vision, and life. Beyond medical insurance, the company provides other healthcare services, including primary-care services, at-home services, and pharmacy benefit management.

Read more on HUM

About Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF

QQQM is an ETF designed to track the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It provides exposure to the 100 largest non-financial companies listed on the NASDAQ. Positioned as a lower-cost and more long-term-investor-friendly alternative to its peer QQQ, QQQM offers the same fundamental market exposure but typically has a lower share price and is structured to appeal to investors focused on accumulation rather than active trading.

Read more on QQQM