Hilton Hotels Corporation Common Stock vs VF Corp — how do they compare? Hilton Hotels Corporation Common Stock trades at $323.19 (market cap $72.14B), while VF Corp trades at $14.52 (market cap $5.65B). The key difference: Hilton Hotels Corporation Common Stock is far larger — about 12.8× VF Corp's market cap, and VF Corp pays the higher dividend (2.5%). Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Hilton Hotels Corporation Common Stock for 138 Days and VF Corp for 64 Days on average.
| HLT | VFC | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $72.14B | $5.65B |
Volume | 862,817 | 6,542,273 |
Sector | Consumer Cyclical | Consumer Cyclical |
52-Week High | $350.22 | $21.55 |
52-Week Low | $256.96 | $12.62 |
Typical Hold Time | 138 Days | 64 Days |
Enterprise Value | $85.15B | $9.94B |
Dividend Yield | 0.19% | 2.5% |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Hilton Worldwide (HLT) trades at $323.29, up 0.21% on the day, with a bullish technical signal from moving averages and strong institutional buying interest. The company reported revenue of $12.04B in 2025, with net income of $1.46B and consistent quarterly EPS beats. Recent news highlights upcoming Q3 2026 earnings and positive travel trends for 2027.
Outlook remains positive with a consensus price target of $348.11, though high debt levels and valuation multiples pose risks. Earnings growth and global expansion in Asia present opportunities, but investors should monitor interest expense and competitive pressures in the hospitality sector.
VFC trades at $14.53, up 0.55% with a bullish technical signal from moving averages. The company reported mixed quarterly results, beating in Q4 2025 but missing in subsequent quarters. Revenue declined from $11.8B in 2022 to $9.5B in 2025, with net losses in recent years. Analyst consensus shows 41% buy ratings with an $18.33 price target, while the stock faces execution risks from Vans brand weakness despite stronger Outdoor segment performance.
The outlook remains cautious with valuation appearing reasonable (P/E 20.84, P/S 0.6) but dependent on successful turnaround execution. Key risks include persistent Vans weakness, high debt levels, and competitive pressures. Upside potential exists if management can stabilize revenue and improve profitability, but investors face significant execution uncertainty in the apparel sector.
Trailing returns across standard periods
Hilton Worldwide Holdings operates 1,074,791 rooms across its 18 brands addressing the midscale through luxury segments as of Dec. 31, 2021. Hampton and Hilton are the two largest brands by total room count at 28% and 21%, respectively, as of Dec. 31, 2021. Recent brands launched over the last few years include Home2, Curio, Canopy, Tru, and Tempo. Managed and franchised represent the vast majority of adjusted EBITDA, predominantly from the Americas regions.
Read more on HLT →VF designs, produces, and distributes branded apparel and accessories. Its largest apparel categories include action sports, outdoor, and workwear. Its portfolio of about a dozen brands includes Vans, The North Face, Timberland, Supreme, and Dickies. VF markets its products in the Americas, Europe, and Asia-Pacific through wholesale sales to retailers, e-commerce, and branded stores owned by the company and partners. The company has grown through multiple acquisitions and traces its roots to 1899.
Read more on VFC →