Hilton Hotels Corporation Common Stock vs iShares Global Clean Energy ETF — how do they compare? Hilton Hotels Corporation Common Stock trades at $323.86 (market cap $72.76B), while iShares Global Clean Energy ETF trades at $17.18 (market cap $2.27B). The key difference: Hilton Hotels Corporation Common Stock is far larger — about 32.1× iShares Global Clean Energy ETF's market cap, and Hilton Hotels Corporation Common Stock pays a 0.19% dividend while iShares Global Clean Energy ETF pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Hilton Hotels Corporation Common Stock for 138 Days and iShares Global Clean Energy ETF for 87 Days on average.
| HLT | ICLN | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $72.76B | $2.27B |
Volume | 1,148,634 | 6,845,064 |
Sector | Consumer Cyclical | — |
52-Week High | $350.22 | $23.75 |
52-Week Low | $256.96 | $15.78 |
Typical Hold Time | 138 Days | 87 Days |
Enterprise Value | $85.78B | — |
Dividend Yield | 0.19% | — |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Hilton Worldwide (HLT) trades at $320.5, down 0.65% on the day, with a bullish technical signal from moving averages and a consensus analyst price target of $348.11. The company has consistently beaten earnings expectations in recent quarters, with Q3 2026 results expected soon. Revenue has grown steadily from $8.8B in 2022 to $12.04B in 2025, though net income margins have fluctuated. Recent news highlights institutional buying and positive travel trends for 2027.
The outlook for HLT is positive, supported by strong earnings performance, analyst optimism, and growth in travel demand. Key risks include high debt levels, with debt-to-asset ratio rising to 73.88% in 2025, and sensitivity to economic cycles affecting travel spending. The stock offers potential upside to the consensus target, but investors should monitor debt management and macroeconomic conditions.
ICLN trades at $17.31, down 1.31% today, with a bearish technical signal from moving averages and neutral oscillators. The ETF's financial ratios are unavailable in the provided data, but recent news highlights its focus on global clean energy with 105 holdings and a 0.38% expense ratio. It faces volatility, with a 57.2% maximum drawdown noted in comparisons against traditional energy ETFs.
The outlook for ICLN is mixed; geopolitical tensions and global renewable energy investments provide tailwinds, but high volatility and competition from fossil fuel ETFs pose risks. Investors should weigh its growth potential against expense ratios and performance consistency in the evolving energy sector.
Trailing returns across standard periods
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
No sentiment data available yet.
Hilton Worldwide Holdings operates 1,074,791 rooms across its 18 brands addressing the midscale through luxury segments as of Dec. 31, 2021. Hampton and Hilton are the two largest brands by total room count at 28% and 21%, respectively, as of Dec. 31, 2021. Recent brands launched over the last few years include Home2, Curio, Canopy, Tru, and Tempo. Managed and franchised represent the vast majority of adjusted EBITDA, predominantly from the Americas regions.
Read more on HLT →The index is designed to track the performance of approximately 100 clean energy-related companies. The fund generally invests at least 80% of its assets in the component securities of the target index. The index may invest up to 20% of its assets in certain futures, trading options and swap contracts, cash and cash equivalents, as well as in securities not included in the index. It is non-diversified.
Read more on ICLN →