iShares Core High Dividend ETF vs Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF — how do they compare? iShares Core High Dividend ETF trades at $28.77 (market cap $14.68B), while Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF trades at $28.29 (market cap $335.90M). The key difference: iShares Core High Dividend ETF is far larger — about 43.7× Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF's market cap, and iShares Core High Dividend ETF is trading nearer its 52-week high, Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF nearer its low. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold iShares Core High Dividend ETF for 117 Days and Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF for 46 Days on average.
| HDV | PBW | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $14.68B | $335.90M |
Volume | 2,925,562 | 628,890 |
52-Week High | $29.93 | $46.99 |
52-Week Low | $23.64 | $28.29 |
Typical Hold Time | 117 Days | 46 Days |
Sector | — | Sector/Thematic |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
HDV (iShares Core High Dividend ETF) trades at $28.28, down 0.28% with neutral technical signals. The ETF recently underwent significant sector rebalancing, reducing healthcare exposure by nearly half while increasing energy, staples, and utilities. Technical indicators show mixed signals with bearish moving averages but neutral oscillators. Recent dividend payments of $0.06-$0.10 per share demonstrate consistent income generation, though the fund's 3% yield may not fully compensate for increased concentration risks.
The outlook remains cautious as HDV's sector concentration (62% in three sectors) creates heightened risk exposure. While the dividend yield provides income stability, the fund's recent underperformance relative to peers and reduced diversification warrant careful monitoring. Investors should weigh the trade-off between current income and long-term growth potential given the significant portfolio restructuring.
PBW, the Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF, trades at $28.92, down 2.89% today amid a bearish technical signal from moving averages. The ETF's unique selection criteria prioritize ecological factors over financial metrics, resulting in concentrated exposure to the clean energy sector. Recent institutional selling, including a 96.3% reduction by IFP Advisors Inc. in Q2 2026 (SEC filing, September 18, 2026), reflects cautious sentiment despite long-term growth drivers like energy security and data center demand.
Outlook remains challenged by near-term volatility and sector underperformance versus broad markets, though global investment in clean energy offers structural tailwinds. Key risks include oil price swings, Fed policy impacts, and lack of diversification. Investors face a trade-off between speculative growth potential and elevated sensitivity to macroeconomic shifts.
Trailing returns across standard periods
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Latest headlines on both assets
The fund generally will invest at least 80% of its assets in the component securities of its underlying index and in investments that have economic characteristics that are substantially identical to the component securities of its underlying index. The underlying index is comprised of qualified income paying securities that are screened for superior company quality and financial health as determined by Morningstar, Inc.'s proprietary index methodology. The fund is non-diversified.
Read more on HDV →PBW is an equal-weighted ETF that invests in U.S. companies leading the clean energy transition. It focuses on renewable energy, power conservation, and sustainable technologies like solar, wind, and energy storage.
Read more on PBW →