Hasbro, Inc. vs Atlassian Corporation PLC — how do they compare? Hasbro, Inc. trades at $92.69 (market cap $12.80B), while Atlassian Corporation PLC trades at $203.16 (market cap $49.56B). The key difference: Atlassian Corporation PLC is far larger — about 3.9× Hasbro, Inc.'s market cap, and Hasbro, Inc. pays a 3.09% dividend while Atlassian Corporation PLC pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Hasbro, Inc. for 97 Days and Atlassian Corporation PLC for 64 Days on average.
| HAS | TEAM | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $12.80B | $49.56B |
Volume | 1,356,688 | 1,747,462 |
Sector | Consumer Cyclical | Technology |
52-Week High | $105.88 | $203.57 |
52-Week Low | $70.95 | $57.15 |
Typical Hold Time | 97 Days | 64 Days |
Enterprise Value | $14.99B | $49.56B |
Dividend Yield | 3.09% | — |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Hasbro (HAS) trades at $92.50, up 1.61% today, with a bullish technical outlook and strong analyst consensus. The stock has consistently beaten earnings estimates in recent quarters, with Q3 2026 results expected on October 20, 2026. Revenue is projected to grow to $5.0B in 2026, with net income rebounding to $794M. The company maintains a solid gross profit margin of 64.41% and positive operating cash flow, though it carries significant long-term debt of $3.38B.
The outlook is positive, driven by earnings momentum and cost-saving initiatives, but risks include high debt levels and competitive pressures. Analyst price targets suggest upside potential, with a consensus target of $107.60. Investors should monitor the upcoming earnings report for confirmation of growth trends and debt management progress.
Atlassian (TEAM) trades at $203.57, up 4.94% with strong technical momentum and bullish moving averages. The stock shows improving fundamentals with revenue growth from $5.22B in 2025 to projected $6.6B in 2026, though it remains unprofitable with a -0.82% net margin. Recent earnings beats and accelerating cloud/AI adoption drive positive sentiment, with analyst consensus strongly bullish at 70% buy ratings.
Outlook remains positive due to cloud migration progress and AI product adoption, but investors face valuation concerns with elevated P/S of 7.75 and EV/EBITDA of 233.57. Key risks include persistent profitability challenges and competitive pressures in enterprise software. Current price exceeds consensus target of $191.16, suggesting near-term consolidation potential.
Trailing returns across standard periods
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
No sentiment data available yet.
Latest headlines on both assets
Hasbro is a branded play company providing children and families around the world with entertainment offerings based on a world-class brand portfolio. From toys and games to television programming, motion pictures, and a licensing program, Hasbro reaches customers by leveraging its well-known brands such as Transformers, Nerf, and Magic: The Gathering. Ownership stakes in Discovery Family, which offers programming around Hasbro brands, and owned production capabilities from Entertainment One help bolster Hasbro's multichannel presence. The firm acquired Entertainment One in 2019, bolting on popular properties like Peppa Pig and PJ Masks, and has plans to tie up with Dungeons & Dragons Beyond in 2022, offering the firm access 10 million digital tabletop players.
Read more on HAS →Atlassian produces software that helps teams work together more efficiently and effectively. The company provides project planning and management software, collaboration tools, and IT help desk solutions. The company operates in four segments: subscriptions (term licenses and cloud agreements), maintenance (annual maintenance contracts that provide support and periodic updates and are generally attached to perpetual license sales), perpetual license (upfront sale for indefinite usage of the software), and other (training, strategic consulting, and revenue from the Atlassian Marketplace app store). Atlassian was founded in 2002 and is headquartered in Sydney.
Read more on TEAM →