Compare Hasbro, Inc. (HAS) vs iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Hasbro, Inc. vs iShares Russell 2000 ETF — how do they compare? Hasbro, Inc. trades at $88.69 (market cap $11.53B), while iShares Russell 2000 ETF trades at $296.46. The key difference: Hasbro, Inc. pays a 3.44% dividend while iShares Russell 2000 ETF pays none, and iShares Russell 2000 ETF is trading nearer its 52-week high, Hasbro, Inc. nearer its low. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| HAS | IWM | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $11.53B | — |
Sector | Consumer Cyclical | — |
52-Week High | $105.88 | $300.45 |
52-Week Low | $70.95 | $214.95 |
Enterprise Value | $13.80B | — |
Dividend Yield | 3.44% | — |
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
About Hasbro, Inc.
Hasbro is a branded play company providing children and families around the world with entertainment offerings based on a world-class brand portfolio. From toys and games to television programming, motion pictures, and a licensing program, Hasbro reaches customers by leveraging its well-known brands such as Transformers, Nerf, and Magic: The Gathering. Ownership stakes in Discovery Family, which offers programming around Hasbro brands, and owned production capabilities from Entertainment One help bolster Hasbro's multichannel presence. The firm acquired Entertainment One in 2019, bolting on popular properties like Peppa Pig and PJ Masks, and has plans to tie up with Dungeons & Dragons Beyond in 2022, offering the firm access 10 million digital tabletop players.
Read more on HAS →About iShares Russell 2000 ETF
The ETF is designed to track the performance of the securities and the stocks in the Russell 2000 Index. To maintain the composition and weightings, the advisor adjusts the ETF from time to time to conform to periodic changes in the index target.
Read more on IWM →
