Compare W W Grainger Inc (GWW) vs New York Times Co (NYT) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
W W Grainger Inc vs New York Times Co — how do they compare? W W Grainger Inc trades at $1,289.79 (market cap $59.76B), while New York Times Co trades at $66.32 (market cap $10.74B). The key difference: W W Grainger Inc is far larger — about 5.6× New York Times Co's market cap, and New York Times Co pays the higher dividend (1.38%). Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold W W Grainger Inc for 25 Days and New York Times Co for 81 Days on average.
| GWW | NYT | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $59.76B | $10.74B |
Volume | 186,697 | 2,096,352 |
Sector | Industrials | Media |
52-Week High | $1.40K | $85.86 |
52-Week Low | $918.18 | $54.66 |
Typical Hold Time | 25 Days | 81 Days |
Enterprise Value | $61.96B | $10.14B |
Dividend Yield | 0.79% | 1.38% |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
W.W. Grainger (GWW) trades at $1,268.67, up 0.41% with mixed technical signals showing bearish moving averages but neutral oscillators. The company demonstrates strong profitability with 47.92% ROE and 9.92% net margin, though valuation metrics appear elevated with a P/E of 32.34. Recent earnings show two consecutive beats, while analyst consensus leans heavily toward Hold (66.66%) with a $1,310 price target. The company continues strategic expansion with a new Oregon distribution center and technology acquisitions.
GWW presents a balanced outlook with solid fundamentals offset by premium valuation. The stock offers steady dividend growth as a Dividend King but faces headwinds from industrial sector challenges. Upside potential exists if earnings momentum continues, though current levels suggest limited near-term catalysts given the cautious analyst stance and technical resistance near $1,280-$1,303.
The New York Times Company (NYT) trades at $66.60, up 2.62% today, reflecting strong momentum after three consecutive quarterly earnings beats. Revenue and net income have grown steadily from 2022 to 2025, with profit margins expanding to 12.17%. The stock shows a bullish technical signal overall, supported by positive cash flow trends and a declared quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. However, a recent shareholder lawsuit alleging reporting bias introduces reputational risk.
Outlook remains positive given consistent earnings outperformance and a consensus price target of $84.00, implying significant upside. Key risks include the ongoing lawsuit, competitive pressures in digital media, and potential volatility from the AI copyright dispute with OpenAI. The company's solid fundamentals and analyst support suggest resilience, but investors should weigh legal and market challenges.
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
No sentiment data available yet.
About W W Grainger Inc
Grainger is a leading broad-line distributor of maintenance, repair, and operating (MRO) products. It serves millions of customers worldwide through an integrated network of branches and digital platforms.
Read more on GWW →About New York Times Co
New York Times Co is an American media company known for publishing its flagship newspaper, The New York Times. The company also operates the International New York Times newspaper, as well as digital properties such as nytimes and various smartphone applications. Circulation of The New York Times is the source of revenue for the company, followed by print and digital advertising and its paid digital-only subscription to The New York Times. The company has a daily print circulation of over 500,000 and 1,000,000 on Sundays. The source of growth for The New York Times is its digital subscription service, which has over 1,000,000 paid users.
Read more on NYT →
