Compare Garmin Ltd. (GRMN) vs Otis Worldwide Corp (OTIS) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Garmin Ltd. vs Otis Worldwide Corp — how do they compare? Garmin Ltd. trades at $271.28 (market cap $51.77B), while Otis Worldwide Corp trades at $66.12 (market cap $25.17B). The key difference: Garmin Ltd. is far larger — about 2.1× Otis Worldwide Corp's market cap, and Otis Worldwide Corp pays the higher dividend (2.66%). Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Garmin Ltd. for 83 Days and Otis Worldwide Corp for 65 Days on average.
| GRMN | OTIS | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $51.77B | $25.17B |
Volume | 961,398 | 4,542,442 |
Sector | Technology | Industrials |
52-Week High | $313.16 | $93.62 |
52-Week Low | $187.10 | $64.05 |
Typical Hold Time | 83 Days | 65 Days |
Enterprise Value | $49.28B | $33.20B |
Dividend Yield | 1.56% | 2.66% |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Garmin (GRMN) trades at $276.16, down 1.09% today, showing strong fundamentals with consistent earnings beats and robust profitability. The company maintains impressive gross margins of 60.08% and net income margins of 24.47%, supported by steady revenue growth from $4.9B in 2022 to $7.25B in 2025. Recent positive developments include multiple product awards and new feature rollouts across marine, fitness, and automotive segments, though technical indicators suggest near-term bearish pressure.
Garmin presents a compelling investment case with strong financial performance and analyst consensus target of $320.25 (16% upside). However, elevated valuation ratios (P/E 28.5, P/S 6.97) and technical bearish signals warrant caution. Key risks include competitive pressures in wearable technology and potential economic sensitivity in consumer discretionary spending.
Otis Worldwide trades at $65.74, down 1.07% on the day and near its 52-week low, reflecting bearish technical signals and recent earnings misses. The company maintains stable revenue around $14.4B USD with a net income margin of 10.17%, but faces margin pressure and a high debt-to-asset ratio of 75.54%. Recent news highlights CEO succession plans and mixed sentiment amid weak equipment demand in China.
The outlook is cautious with moderate upside to the $87.00 consensus price target, supported by a dominant service segment and institutional accumulation. Key risks include persistent margin compression, China exposure, and elevated leverage, requiring monitoring of service margin recovery for sustained growth.
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
No sentiment data available yet.
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
About Garmin Ltd.
Garmin produces GPS-enabled hardware and software for five verticals: fitness, outdoors, auto, aviation, and marine. The company relies on licensing mapping data to enable its hardware specialized for often niche activities like scuba diving or sailing. Garmin operates in 100 countries and sells its products via distributors as well as relationships with original equipment manufacturers.
Read more on GRMN →About Otis Worldwide Corp
Otis is the largest global elevator and escalator supplier by revenue with around one quarter of share excluding Japan. In 1854 Otis' founder and namesake, Elisha Graves Otis, invented a safety mechanism that prevented elevators from falling if the hoisting cable failed.The company's product and service lifecycle begins with installations of elevator units in new buildings, later selling maintenance services on the units, and eventually replacement of the units after the average 15-20 year useful life of an elevator. As the largest global OEM, over decades Otis has built a base of 2 million elevators under service. Its business model is much the same as that of its competitors Kone, Schindler, and Thyssenkrupp.
Read more on OTIS →
