Investment
Features
FeesSafety
Academy
More
Pluang+

Compare YieldMax AI & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (GPTY) vs Ingersoll Rand (IR) Price & Performance

YieldMax AI & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETFTrade
Ingersoll RandTrade

Price performance (Past 24H)

Key statistics

YieldMax AI & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF vs Ingersoll Rand — how do they compare? YieldMax AI & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF trades at $42.99 (market cap $136.17M), while Ingersoll Rand trades at $78.16 (market cap $29.97B). The key difference: Ingersoll Rand is far larger — about 220.1× YieldMax AI & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF's market cap, and Ingersoll Rand pays a 0.1% dividend while YieldMax AI & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold YieldMax AI & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF for 60 Days and Ingersoll Rand for 7 Days on average.

GPTYIR
Market Cap
$136.17M$29.97B
Volume
88,0954,688,805
Sector
Income / Options OverlayIndustrials
52-Week High
$50.52$98.76
52-Week Low
$34.73$68.54
Typical Hold Time
60 Days7 Days
Enterprise Value
—$33.63B
Dividend Yield
—0.1%

Returns comparison

Trailing returns across standard periods

Investor sentiment on Pluang

What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days

GPTY
100% Buy0% Sell
Avg holding period · 60 Days
IR

No sentiment data available yet.

About YieldMax AI & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF

GPTY is an actively managed ETF that seeks to provide current income and capital appreciation by holding a concentrated portfolio of 15 to 30 leading AI and technology companies. It utilizes a variety of options strategies, including selling call options on its underlying holdings, to generate weekly distributions while maintaining direct equity exposure to the growth of the AI sector.

Read more on GPTY →

About Ingersoll Rand

Ingersoll Rand develops industrial technologies for creating and managing flow, pressure, and motion. Its portfolio includes compressors, pumps, vacuum systems, and other equipment used across industrial markets.

Read more on IR →