Compare Global Payments Inc (GPN) vs iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Global Payments Inc vs iShares Global Clean Energy ETF — how do they compare? Global Payments Inc trades at $81.62 (market cap $21.46B), while iShares Global Clean Energy ETF trades at $17.24 (market cap $2.27B). The key difference: Global Payments Inc is far larger — about 9.5× iShares Global Clean Energy ETF's market cap, and Global Payments Inc pays a 1.23% dividend while iShares Global Clean Energy ETF pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Global Payments Inc for 50 Days and iShares Global Clean Energy ETF for 87 Days on average.
| GPN | ICLN | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $21.46B | $2.27B |
Volume | 1,482,600 | 6,845,064 |
Sector | Financials | — |
52-Week High | $94.83 | $23.75 |
52-Week Low | $62.47 | $15.78 |
Typical Hold Time | 50 Days | 87 Days |
Enterprise Value | $39.60B | — |
Dividend Yield | 1.23% | — |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Global Payments (GPN) trades at $82.20, up 1.38% on the day, with a neutral technical signal and bullish moving averages. The stock has beaten EPS estimates for three consecutive quarters, though Q3 2026 results are pending. Revenue declined to $7.71B in 2025, but net income margin improved to 18.16%. Analyst consensus is bullish with a $102.75 price target, representing significant upside. Recent news highlights growth initiatives like the Genius platform and Worldpay integration.
GPN offers potential upside based on strong analyst sentiment and strategic initiatives, but faces risks from rising costs, high debt levels, and competitive pressures. The negative net income margin projection for 2026 underscores execution challenges. Investors should weigh the company's digital payment growth against macroeconomic and operational headwinds.
ICLN trades at $17.17, down 0.81% with bearish technical signals from moving averages. The ETF shows neutral momentum oscillators but faces significant volatility compared to traditional energy peers. Recent news highlights ICLN's 57.2% maximum drawdown and higher expense ratio of 0.38% versus fossil fuel ETFs, though geopolitical tensions are driving renewed interest in renewable energy infrastructure.
The clean energy sector faces competitive pressure from higher-yielding traditional energy ETFs, but long-term growth prospects remain supported by global energy transition trends. Key risks include expense ratio disadvantages and sector volatility, while potential catalysts include increased renewable adoption driven by geopolitical and environmental factors.
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
No sentiment data available yet.
About Global Payments Inc
Global Payments is a leading provider of payment processing and software solutions and focuses on serving small and midsize merchants. The company operates in 30 countries and generates about one fourth of its revenue from outside North America, primarily in Europe and Asia. In 2019, Global Payments merged with Total System Services in an all-stock deal that gave Total System Services shareholders 48% of the combined company's shares.
Read more on GPN →About iShares Global Clean Energy ETF
The index is designed to track the performance of approximately 100 clean energy-related companies. The fund generally invests at least 80% of its assets in the component securities of the target index. The index may invest up to 20% of its assets in certain futures, trading options and swap contracts, cash and cash equivalents, as well as in securities not included in the index. It is non-diversified.
Read more on ICLN →
