Global Payments Inc vs iShares Global Clean Energy ETF — how do they compare? Global Payments Inc trades at $88.53 (market cap $22.72B), while iShares Global Clean Energy ETF trades at $18.43. The key difference: Global Payments Inc pays a 1.16% dividend while iShares Global Clean Energy ETF pays none, and Global Payments Inc is trading nearer its 52-week high, iShares Global Clean Energy ETF nearer its low. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| GPN | ICLN | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $22.72B | — |
Sector | Industrials | — |
52-Week High | $90.01 | $23.75 |
52-Week Low | $62.47 | $13.66 |
Enterprise Value | $40.87B | — |
Dividend Yield | 1.16% | — |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Global Payments (GPN) trades at $88.65, up 2.93% today, with a bullish technical signal and consistent earnings beats. The stock shows strong profitability with a 63.91% gross margin but negative net income margin and ROE. Recent Q2 2026 EPS of $3.46 beat estimates, though revenue guidance was trimmed. Analyst consensus is a Buy with a $96.67 target.
GPN offers upside to analyst targets but faces risks from margin pressure and competitive fintech landscape. Debt-to-asset ratio rose to 41.57% in 2025, increasing financial leverage concerns. Investment appeal hinges on execution of the Genius platform strategy amid economic headwinds.
ICLN, the iShares Global Clean Energy ETF, trades at $18.41, up 1.83% today, but technical indicators signal a bearish trend with moving averages and overall momentum pointing lower. The fund provides exposure to 105 global renewable energy companies, though key valuation and profitability ratios are not publicly disclosed for the ETF itself. Recent news highlights strong 2026 performance with over 25% gains, driven by global energy security concerns and data center power demand, though it faces competition from traditional energy ETFs offering lower fees and higher yields.
The outlook for ICLN is mixed; clean energy tailwinds from policy support and electrification trends offer growth potential, but risks include regulatory hurdles, fee competitiveness, and volatility. Analyst sentiment is cautious due to fee comparisons and policy dependence, with institutional interest balanced against outperformance of alternatives like uranium ETFs. Investment suitability hinges on appetite for clean energy sector volatility versus stable income.
Trailing returns across standard periods
Latest headlines on both assets
Global Payments is a leading provider of payment processing and software solutions and focuses on serving small and midsize merchants. The company operates in 30 countries and generates about one fourth of its revenue from outside North America, primarily in Europe and Asia. In 2019, Global Payments merged with Total System Services in an all-stock deal that gave Total System Services shareholders 48% of the combined company's shares.
Read more on GPN →The index is designed to track the performance of approximately 100 clean energy-related companies. The fund generally invests at least 80% of its assets in the component securities of the target index. The index may invest up to 20% of its assets in certain futures, trading options and swap contracts, cash and cash equivalents, as well as in securities not included in the index. It is non-diversified.
Read more on ICLN →