GameStop Corp. vs iShares Global Clean Energy ETF — how do they compare? GameStop Corp. trades at $18.55 (market cap $8.44B), while iShares Global Clean Energy ETF trades at $18.43. The key difference: iShares Global Clean Energy ETF is trading nearer its 52-week high, GameStop Corp. nearer its low. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| GME | ICLN | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $8.44B | — |
Sector | Consumer Cyclical | — |
52-Week High | $27.69 | $23.75 |
52-Week Low | $18.79 | $13.66 |
Enterprise Value | $4.42B | — |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
GME trades at $18.605, down 0.98% on the day, with a bearish technical signal from moving averages. The company reported strong earnings beats in recent quarters, with Q1 2026 EPS of $0.30 beating expectations of $0.16. Revenue for 2025 was $3.82B, with net income of $131.3M and a profit margin of 3.43%. Recent news highlights a potential shift from a $56B eBay takeover bid to a partnership, as reported by Bloomberg on August 10, 2026.
The outlook is mixed: strong profitability improvements and debt reduction support upside, but analyst consensus is cautious with only 16.67% buy ratings. Key risks include execution of strategic partnerships, competitive pressures in retail, and shareholder dilution from recent debt-for-stock swaps. The stock's valuation appears reasonable with a P/E of 14.04, but sentiment remains divided.
ICLN, the iShares Global Clean Energy ETF, trades at $18.41, up 1.83% today, but technical indicators signal a bearish trend with moving averages and overall momentum pointing lower. The fund provides exposure to 105 global renewable energy companies, though key valuation and profitability ratios are not publicly disclosed for the ETF itself. Recent news highlights strong 2026 performance with over 25% gains, driven by global energy security concerns and data center power demand, though it faces competition from traditional energy ETFs offering lower fees and higher yields.
The outlook for ICLN is mixed; clean energy tailwinds from policy support and electrification trends offer growth potential, but risks include regulatory hurdles, fee competitiveness, and volatility. Analyst sentiment is cautious due to fee comparisons and policy dependence, with institutional interest balanced against outperformance of alternatives like uranium ETFs. Investment suitability hinges on appetite for clean energy sector volatility versus stable income.
Trailing returns across standard periods
Latest headlines on both assets
Global Market Group Ltd. operates an Internet website that connects Chinese manufacturers with international buyers. The Company's customers can post company profiles and product information in standardized formats; post product listings; and trade leads.
Read more on GME →The index is designed to track the performance of approximately 100 clean energy-related companies. The fund generally invests at least 80% of its assets in the component securities of the target index. The index may invest up to 20% of its assets in certain futures, trading options and swap contracts, cash and cash equivalents, as well as in securities not included in the index. It is non-diversified.
Read more on ICLN →