Compare General Motors Company (GM) vs Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (MRSH) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
General Motors Company vs Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. — how do they compare? General Motors Company trades at $87.3 (market cap $78.40B), while Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. trades at $189.2 (market cap $91.27B). The key difference: Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. is the larger of the two by market cap, and Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. pays the higher dividend (2.07%). Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| GM | MRSH | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $78.40B | $91.27B |
Sector | Consumer Cyclical | Financials |
52-Week High | $90.30 | $211.21 |
52-Week Low | $54.16 | $157.32 |
Enterprise Value | $181.38B | $111.95B |
Dividend Yield | 0.81% | 2.07% |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
General Motors (GM) trades at $87.74, down 0.25% on the day, with strong technical momentum indicated by bullish moving averages. The company has demonstrated consistent earnings outperformance, beating estimates in the last three quarters. Recent strategic moves include a $4.5 billion parts supply deal and extending its China joint venture for 20 years. Valuation metrics show attractive P/S and P/B ratios, though profitability margins remain thin with net income margin at 1.05%.
GM presents a compelling investment case with analyst consensus pointing to 24% upside to the $108.82 price target. Strong cash flow generation and strategic partnerships support growth prospects, but investors face risks from declining profit margins, rising debt levels, and automotive industry cyclicality. The stock's current technical positioning near key support levels suggests potential for near-term stability.
Marsh & McLennan (MRSH) trades at $190.79, down 0.45% on the day, with a bullish technical signal and strong fundamental performance. Recent Q2 2026 earnings beat estimates with EPS of $2.96 versus $2.88 expected, driven by 6% revenue growth. The company announced the acquisition of Accel to expand Midwest operations, enhancing its insurance and consulting services. Valuation metrics show a P/E of 23.35 and ROE of 25.72%, reflecting robust profitability.
Outlook remains positive with a consensus price target of $202.89, offering ~6% upside. Risks include margin pressure from rising expenses and soft P&C pricing. Institutional activity is mixed, with Bank of America reducing its stake while others like Ashton Thomas Securities added positions. The stock presents a growth opportunity amid strategic expansions, though investors should monitor expense management and competitive dynamics.
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
About General Motors Company
General Motors Co. emerged from the bankruptcy of General Motors Corp. (old GM) in July 2009. GM has eight brands and operates under four segments: GM North America, GM International, Cruise, and GM Financial. The United States now has four brands instead of eight under old GM. The company lost its U.S. market share leader crown in 2021 with share down 280 basis points to 14.6%, but we expect GM to reclaim the top spot in 2022 as 2021 suffered from the chip shortage. GM Financial became the company's captive finance arm in October 2010 via the purchase of AmeriCredit.
Read more on GM →About Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.
Marsh & McLennan Companies Inc is a professional services firm that provides advice and solutions in the areas of risk, strategy, and human capital. The company operates through two main segments: risk and insurance services and consulting. In risk and insurance services, the firm offers services via Marsh (an insurance broker) and Guy Carpenter (a risk and reinsurance specialist). The consulting division comprises Mercer (a provider of human resource services) and Oliver Wyman (management and economic consultancy).
Read more on MRSH →
