Gilead Sciences, Inc. vs Northrop Grumman Corporation — how do they compare? Gilead Sciences, Inc. trades at $146.25 (market cap $182.40B), while Northrop Grumman Corporation trades at $480.11 (market cap $68.83B). The key difference: Gilead Sciences, Inc. is far larger — about 2.7× Northrop Grumman Corporation's market cap, and Gilead Sciences, Inc. pays the higher dividend (2.23%). Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Gilead Sciences, Inc. for 111 Days and Northrop Grumman Corporation for 81 Days on average.
| GILD | NOC | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $182.40B | $68.83B |
Volume | 4,469,821 | 1,081,989 |
Sector | Health | Industrials |
52-Week High | $155.80 | $768.02 |
52-Week Low | $116.74 | $473.46 |
Typical Hold Time | 111 Days | 81 Days |
Enterprise Value | $205.46B | $82.81B |
Dividend Yield | 2.23% | 2.04% |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Gilead Sciences (GILD) trades at $146.85, up 1.82% today, with a bullish technical signal from moving averages and recent earnings beats in Q4 2025 and Q1 2026. The company reported strong 2025 revenue of $29.44B and net income of $8.51B, though 2026 projections show a net loss. Key developments include a partnership with PAHO to expand HIV prevention drug access in Latin America, supporting long-term growth prospects amid mixed profitability metrics.
The outlook for GILD is cautiously optimistic, driven by analyst consensus favoring a buy rating (65.52%) and a price target of $151.57. Opportunities lie in HIV and oncology pipeline advancements, but risks include negative 2026 profit margins and high debt levels. Investors should weigh strong cash flow from operations against execution risks in a competitive biopharma landscape.
Northrop Grumman (NOC) trades at $473.46, down 2.0% on the day, reflecting a bearish technical signal amid recent contract loss news. The stock exhibits strong fundamentals with a P/E of 15.05, net income margin of 10.48%, and consistent earnings beats in recent quarters. Revenue growth is steady, supported by a record backlog, though the loss of the $20 billion Navy F/A-XX contract to Boeing introduces competitive pressure.
The outlook remains supported by robust defense budgets and key programs like the B-21 bomber, but investor sentiment is cautious near-term. Analyst consensus is bullish with a $600.62 price target, though technical indicators suggest potential near-term weakness. Risks include contract dependencies and macroeconomic shifts in defense spending.
Trailing returns across standard periods
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Latest headlines on both assets
Gilead Sciences develops and markets therapies to treat life-threatening infectious diseases, with the core of its portfolio focused on HIV and hepatitis B and C. The acquisitions of Corus Pharma, Myogen, CV Therapeutics, Arresto Biosciences, and Calistoga have broadened this focus to include pulmonary and cardiovascular diseases and cancer. Gilead's acquisition of Pharmasset brought rights to hepatitis C drug Sovaldi, which is also part of combination drug Harvoni, and the Kite, Forty Seven, and Immunomedics acquisitions boost Gilead's exposure to cell therapy and noncell therapy in oncology.
Read more on GILD →Northrop Grumman is a defense contractor that is diversified across short-cycle and long-cycle businesses. The firm's segments include aeronautics, mission systems, defense services, and space systems. The company's aerospace segment creates the fuselage for the massive F-35 program and produces various piloted and autonomous flight systems. Mission systems creates a variety of sensors and processors for defense hardware. The defense systems segment is a long-range missile manufacturer. Finally, the company's space systems segment produces various space structures, sensors, and satellites.
Read more on NOC →