Investment
Features
FeesSafety
Academy
More
Pluang+

Compare Gilead Sciences, Inc. (GILD) vs Marqeta Inc (MQ) Price & Performance

Gilead Sciences, Inc.Trade
Marqeta IncTrade

Price performance (Past 24H)

Key statistics

Gilead Sciences, Inc. vs Marqeta Inc — how do they compare? Gilead Sciences, Inc. trades at $147.01 (market cap $182.40B), while Marqeta Inc trades at $17.1 (market cap $1.82B). The key difference: Gilead Sciences, Inc. is far larger — about 100.2× Marqeta Inc's market cap, and Gilead Sciences, Inc. pays a 2.23% dividend while Marqeta Inc pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Gilead Sciences, Inc. for 111 Days and Marqeta Inc for 44 Days on average.

GILDMQ
Market Cap
$182.40B$1.82B
Volume
4,469,8211,126,466
Sector
HealthTechnology
52-Week High
$155.80$20.32
52-Week Low
$116.74$15.04
Typical Hold Time
111 Days44 Days
Enterprise Value
$205.46B$1.13B
Dividend Yield
2.23%—

Aura AI Summary

Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice

Gilead Sciences, Inc.

Gilead Sciences (GILD) trades at $146.85, up 1.82% with bullish technical signals and strong analyst support. Recent earnings beat expectations in three consecutive quarters, though Q2 showed a significant loss. The company maintains robust operating cash flow of $10.02B (2025) and expanded HIV prevention access through a major PAHO partnership. Valuation metrics show a P/E of 17.84 and P/S of 6.02, with revenue growth from $29.44B (2025) to projected $30.5B (2026).

Outlook remains positive with 65% analyst buy ratings and $151.57 consensus target, though risks include negative net income margin (-10.64%) and high debt levels. The stock offers dividend income ($0.82 upcoming) and pipeline catalysts in oncology/HIV, but investors should monitor earnings volatility and competitive pressures in biopharma.

Marqeta Inc

Marqeta (MQ) trades at $17.06, up 3.08% with a bullish technical signal from moving averages. The company shows improving fundamentals with three consecutive quarterly EPS beats and revenue growth from $507M in 2024 to projected $677M in 2026. Recent partnerships with BVNK for stablecoin cards and Google for wallet expansion highlight strategic growth initiatives. However, valuation metrics remain elevated with a P/E of 189.56 and EV/EBITDA of 52.44 despite modest profitability margins.

MQ presents a mixed outlook with strong operational momentum but premium valuation. The stock offers growth potential through expanding payment partnerships and enterprise adoption, though faces risks from contract renewals in Q3 2026 and competitive pressure. Analyst consensus of $11.38 suggests caution despite recent bullish earnings revisions and institutional interest in the digital payments space.

Returns comparison

Trailing returns across standard periods

Investor sentiment on Pluang

What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days

GILD
100% Buy0% Sell
Avg holding period · 111 Days
MQ

No sentiment data available yet.

About Gilead Sciences, Inc.

Gilead Sciences develops and markets therapies to treat life-threatening infectious diseases, with the core of its portfolio focused on HIV and hepatitis B and C. The acquisitions of Corus Pharma, Myogen, CV Therapeutics, Arresto Biosciences, and Calistoga have broadened this focus to include pulmonary and cardiovascular diseases and cancer. Gilead's acquisition of Pharmasset brought rights to hepatitis C drug Sovaldi, which is also part of combination drug Harvoni, and the Kite, Forty Seven, and Immunomedics acquisitions boost Gilead's exposure to cell therapy and noncell therapy in oncology.

Read more on GILD →

About Marqeta Inc

Headquartered in Oakland, California, and founded in 2010, Marqeta provides its clients with a card-issuing platform that offers the infrastructure and tools necessary to offer digital, physical, and tokenized payment options without the need for a traditional bank. The company's open APIs are designed to allow third parties like DoorDash, Klarna, and Block to rapidly develop and deploy innovative card-based products and payment services without the need to develop the underlying technology. The company generates revenue primarily through processing and ATM fees for cards issued on its platform.

Read more on MQ →