Gold Fields Limited vs VF Corp — how do they compare? Gold Fields Limited trades at $37.24 (market cap $31.26B), while VF Corp trades at $14.52 (market cap $5.65B). The key difference: Gold Fields Limited is far larger — about 5.5× VF Corp's market cap, and Gold Fields Limited pays the higher dividend (6.14%). Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Gold Fields Limited for 49 Days and VF Corp for 64 Days on average.
| GFI | VFC | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $31.26B | $5.65B |
Volume | 3,397,922 | 6,542,273 |
Sector | Basic Materials | Consumer Cyclical |
52-Week High | $61.52 | $21.55 |
52-Week Low | $31.25 | $12.62 |
Typical Hold Time | 49 Days | 64 Days |
Enterprise Value | $31.87B | $9.94B |
Dividend Yield | 6.14% | 2.5% |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Gold Fields (GFI) trades at $35.86, down 0.86% with bearish technical signals but strong fundamentals including 40.76% net margin and 58.38% ROE. Recent earnings show mixed results with one beat and three misses against expectations. The company's proposed $27 billion takeover of Northern Star was rejected, creating near-term uncertainty while highlighting growth ambitions. Operating cash flow surged to $3.77 billion in 2025, supporting robust shareholder returns.
GFI presents a value opportunity with low P/E of 7.14 and 44% upside to consensus target of $52.75, though recent acquisition volatility and earnings misses warrant caution. The stock's bearish technical posture contrasts with strong cash generation and analyst support (8 Buy, 10 Hold ratings), creating potential for recovery as standalone operations deliver growth.
VFC trades at $14.53, up 0.55% with a bullish technical signal from moving averages. The company reported mixed quarterly results, beating in Q4 2025 but missing in subsequent quarters. Revenue declined from $11.8B in 2022 to $9.5B in 2025, with net losses in recent years. Analyst consensus shows 41% buy ratings with an $18.33 price target, while the stock faces execution risks from Vans brand weakness despite stronger Outdoor segment performance.
The outlook remains cautious with valuation appearing reasonable (P/E 20.84, P/S 0.6) but dependent on successful turnaround execution. Key risks include persistent Vans weakness, high debt levels, and competitive pressures. Upside potential exists if management can stabilize revenue and improve profitability, but investors face significant execution uncertainty in the apparel sector.
Trailing returns across standard periods
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
No sentiment data available yet.
Gold Fields Ltd is a producer of gold and is a holder of gold reserves and resources in South Africa, Ghana, Australia and Peru. In Peru, the company also produces copper. The company is primarily involved in underground and surface gold and surface copper mining and silver and related activities, including exploration, extraction, processing and smelting. It conducts underground and surface mining operations at St. Ives, underground-only operations at Agnew, Granny Smith and South Deep and surface-only open pit mining at Damang, Tarkwa and Cerro Corona. The company's revenues are derived from the sale of gold that it produces.
Read more on GFI →VF designs, produces, and distributes branded apparel and accessories. Its largest apparel categories include action sports, outdoor, and workwear. Its portfolio of about a dozen brands includes Vans, The North Face, Timberland, Supreme, and Dickies. VF markets its products in the Americas, Europe, and Asia-Pacific through wholesale sales to retailers, e-commerce, and branded stores owned by the company and partners. The company has grown through multiple acquisitions and traces its roots to 1899.
Read more on VFC →