Gold Fields Limited vs Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF — how do they compare? Gold Fields Limited trades at $36.85 (market cap $31.87B), while Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF trades at $309.41 (market cap $113.40B). The key difference: Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF is far larger — about 3.6× Gold Fields Limited's market cap, and Gold Fields Limited pays a 6% dividend while Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Gold Fields Limited for 49 Days and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF for 54 Days on average.
| GFI | QQQM | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $31.87B | $113.40B |
Volume | 4,169,651 | 2,866,236 |
Sector | Basic Materials | Broad Market / Factor |
52-Week High | $61.52 | $312.76 |
52-Week Low | $31.25 | $229.87 |
Typical Hold Time | 49 Days | 54 Days |
Enterprise Value | $32.47B | — |
Dividend Yield | 6% | — |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Gold Fields (GFI) trades at $36.82, up 5.05% today, amid mixed technical signals with a bearish overall trend. Fundamentally, the company shows strong profitability with 38.66% net margins and robust cash flow generation of $3.77B from operations in 2025. Recent news highlights the rejected $27B Northern Star takeover bid and strong operational performance from Salares Norte, driving investor attention to the company's capital allocation strategy.
The investment outlook balances strong fundamentals against acquisition risks and technical weakness. With 44% analyst buy ratings and a $52.75 price target suggesting 43% upside, GFI presents value opportunity, though recent earnings misses and bearish technicals warrant caution. Key risks include execution on growth projects and gold price volatility.
QQQM (Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF) trades at $309.27, down 0.88% on the day, with a bullish technical signal from moving averages. The ETF tracks the NASDAQ-100 index with a low 0.15% expense ratio. Recent institutional buying includes QRG Capital Management increasing its position by 207.5% during Q2 2026. Technical indicators show support at $305 and resistance at $311, with neutral oscillator readings suggesting balanced momentum.
The outlook remains positive given the NASDAQ-100's growth exposure and cost efficiency versus QQQ. Risks include market concentration in technology stocks and potential volatility from macroeconomic factors. Institutional accumulation and favorable expense structure support long-term positioning, though investors should monitor index composition changes and broader market trends.
Trailing returns across standard periods
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Latest headlines on both assets
Gold Fields Ltd is a producer of gold and is a holder of gold reserves and resources in South Africa, Ghana, Australia and Peru. In Peru, the company also produces copper. The company is primarily involved in underground and surface gold and surface copper mining and silver and related activities, including exploration, extraction, processing and smelting. It conducts underground and surface mining operations at St. Ives, underground-only operations at Agnew, Granny Smith and South Deep and surface-only open pit mining at Damang, Tarkwa and Cerro Corona. The company's revenues are derived from the sale of gold that it produces.
Read more on GFI →QQQM is an ETF designed to track the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It provides exposure to the 100 largest non-financial companies listed on the NASDAQ. Positioned as a lower-cost and more long-term-investor-friendly alternative to its peer QQQ, QQQM offers the same fundamental market exposure but typically has a lower share price and is structured to appeal to investors focused on accumulation rather than active trading.
Read more on QQQM →