Gold Fields Limited vs Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF — how do they compare? Gold Fields Limited trades at $36.7 (market cap $31.26B), while Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF trades at $28.29 (market cap $347.46M). The key difference: Gold Fields Limited is far larger — about 90× Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF's market cap, and Gold Fields Limited pays a 6.14% dividend while Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Gold Fields Limited for 49 Days and Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF for 46 Days on average.
| GFI | PBW | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $31.26B | $347.46M |
Volume | 3,397,922 | 413,698 |
Sector | Basic Materials | Sector/Thematic |
52-Week High | $61.52 | $46.99 |
52-Week Low | $31.25 | $28.29 |
Typical Hold Time | 49 Days | 46 Days |
Enterprise Value | $31.87B | — |
Dividend Yield | 6.14% | — |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Gold Fields (GFI) trades at $35.86, down 0.86% with bearish technical signals but strong fundamentals including 40.76% net margin and 58.38% ROE. Recent earnings show mixed results with one beat and three misses against expectations. The company's proposed $27 billion takeover of Northern Star was rejected, creating near-term uncertainty while highlighting growth ambitions. Operating cash flow surged to $3.77 billion in 2025, supporting robust shareholder returns.
GFI presents a value opportunity with low P/E of 7.14 and 44% upside to consensus target of $52.75, though recent acquisition volatility and earnings misses warrant caution. The stock's bearish technical posture contrasts with strong cash generation and analyst support (8 Buy, 10 Hold ratings), creating potential for recovery as standalone operations deliver growth.
PBW, the Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF, trades at $28.92, down 2.89% today amid a bearish technical signal from moving averages. The ETF's unique selection criteria prioritize ecological factors over financial metrics, resulting in concentrated exposure to the clean energy sector. Recent institutional selling, including a 96.3% reduction by IFP Advisors Inc. in Q2 2026 (SEC filing, September 18, 2026), reflects cautious sentiment despite long-term growth drivers like energy security and data center demand.
Outlook remains challenged by near-term volatility and sector underperformance versus broad markets, though global investment in clean energy offers structural tailwinds. Key risks include oil price swings, Fed policy impacts, and lack of diversification. Investors face a trade-off between speculative growth potential and elevated sensitivity to macroeconomic shifts.
Trailing returns across standard periods
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Gold Fields Ltd is a producer of gold and is a holder of gold reserves and resources in South Africa, Ghana, Australia and Peru. In Peru, the company also produces copper. The company is primarily involved in underground and surface gold and surface copper mining and silver and related activities, including exploration, extraction, processing and smelting. It conducts underground and surface mining operations at St. Ives, underground-only operations at Agnew, Granny Smith and South Deep and surface-only open pit mining at Damang, Tarkwa and Cerro Corona. The company's revenues are derived from the sale of gold that it produces.
Read more on GFI →PBW is an equal-weighted ETF that invests in U.S. companies leading the clean energy transition. It focuses on renewable energy, power conservation, and sustainable technologies like solar, wind, and energy storage.
Read more on PBW →