Gold Fields Limited vs Otis Worldwide Corp — how do they compare? Gold Fields Limited trades at $36.76 (market cap $31.87B), while Otis Worldwide Corp trades at $66.24 (market cap $25.17B). The key difference: Gold Fields Limited is the larger of the two by market cap, and Gold Fields Limited pays the higher dividend (6%). Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Gold Fields Limited for 49 Days and Otis Worldwide Corp for 65 Days on average.
| GFI | OTIS | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $31.87B | $25.17B |
Volume | 4,169,651 | 4,542,442 |
Sector | Basic Materials | Industrials |
52-Week High | $61.52 | $93.62 |
52-Week Low | $31.25 | $64.05 |
Typical Hold Time | 49 Days | 65 Days |
Enterprise Value | $32.47B | $33.20B |
Dividend Yield | 6% | 2.66% |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Gold Fields (GFI) trades at $36.70, up 4.71% over 24 hours, but technical indicators signal a bearish trend with price near support at $35. The company reported strong 2025 results with revenue of $8.75 billion and net income of $3.57 billion, yielding high profitability margins. However, recent earnings misses and a rejected $27 billion takeover bid for Northern Star have introduced volatility. Analyst consensus remains positive with a $52.75 price target, but the stock faces headwinds from acquisition-related uncertainty and mixed technical signals.
GFI presents a compelling value case with low P/E of 7.3 and robust cash flow growth, but investors must weigh execution risks from its aggressive M&A strategy and recent earnings inconsistencies against its strong fundamentals and shareholder returns. The stock's near-term direction hinges on merger outcomes and gold price stability.
Otis Worldwide trades at $65.74, down 1.07% with a bearish technical signal and recent earnings misses. The stock trades near its 52-week low with mixed analyst sentiment (46.7% buy, 46.7% hold) despite a consensus price target of $87.00. Revenue growth remains stable at $14.43B (2025) with 10.17% net margins, though service margins face pressure from labor costs. Recent CEO succession news and China project wins provide strategic context amid weak equipment demand.
The outlook balances stable service revenue against margin pressures and China exposure. Upside exists if service margins recover and modernization backlog converts, but near-term headwinds and technical weakness suggest cautious positioning. Key risks include prolonged China weakness and execution on cost controls.
Trailing returns across standard periods
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
No sentiment data available yet.
Latest headlines on both assets
Gold Fields Ltd is a producer of gold and is a holder of gold reserves and resources in South Africa, Ghana, Australia and Peru. In Peru, the company also produces copper. The company is primarily involved in underground and surface gold and surface copper mining and silver and related activities, including exploration, extraction, processing and smelting. It conducts underground and surface mining operations at St. Ives, underground-only operations at Agnew, Granny Smith and South Deep and surface-only open pit mining at Damang, Tarkwa and Cerro Corona. The company's revenues are derived from the sale of gold that it produces.
Read more on GFI →Otis is the largest global elevator and escalator supplier by revenue with around one quarter of share excluding Japan. In 1854 Otis' founder and namesake, Elisha Graves Otis, invented a safety mechanism that prevented elevators from falling if the hoisting cable failed.The company's product and service lifecycle begins with installations of elevator units in new buildings, later selling maintenance services on the units, and eventually replacement of the units after the average 15-20 year useful life of an elevator. As the largest global OEM, over decades Otis has built a base of 2 million elevators under service. Its business model is much the same as that of its competitors Kone, Schindler, and Thyssenkrupp.
Read more on OTIS →