Compare Gold Fields Limited (GFI) vs Monster Beverage Corp (MNST) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Gold Fields Limited vs Monster Beverage Corp — how do they compare? Gold Fields Limited trades at $42.77 (market cap $36.07B), while Monster Beverage Corp trades at $45.39 (market cap $89.20B). The key difference: Monster Beverage Corp is far larger — about 2.5× Gold Fields Limited's market cap, and Gold Fields Limited pays a 5.76% dividend while Monster Beverage Corp pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| GFI | MNST | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $36.07B | $89.20B |
Sector | Basic Materials | Consumer Staples |
52-Week High | $61.52 | $49.97 |
52-Week Low | $29.31 | $30.86 |
Enterprise Value | $37.51B | $87.49B |
Dividend Yield | 5.76% | — |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Gold Fields Limited (GFI) trades at $41.12, up 0.73% on the day, with a bullish technical outlook supported by moving averages. The stock shows strong profitability with a 40.76% net income margin and ROE of 52.33%, though recent quarterly earnings missed expectations. Revenue grew to $5.2B in 2024, with net income reaching $1.25B. Analyst consensus is a Buy with a $52 price target, indicating 26% upside potential.
The outlook for GFI is positive given its robust fundamentals and gold price tailwinds, but risks include volatile earnings performance and rising debt levels. Institutional accumulation and favorable sector sentiment support the bullish case, though investors should monitor cost pressures and execution on growth targets.
Monster Beverage (MNST) trades at $45.69, up 1.13% today. The stock shows strong fundamentals with Q2 2026 EPS of $0.60 beating estimates, driven by 20% revenue growth and a 23.08% net income margin. A 2-for-1 stock split occurred on August 11, 2026. However, technical indicators signal a bearish trend, with the current price below key resistance levels. Analyst consensus is bullish with a $51.14 price target, but high valuation ratios like a P/E of 42.16 pose risks.
Outlook: MNST's international expansion and earnings beats support growth, but stretched valuations and bearish technicals suggest near-term volatility. Investment opportunity lies in sustained profit margins, while risks include competitive pressures and premium pricing sensitivity.
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
About Gold Fields Limited
Gold Fields Ltd is a producer of gold and is a holder of gold reserves and resources in South Africa, Ghana, Australia and Peru. In Peru, the company also produces copper. The company is primarily involved in underground and surface gold and surface copper mining and silver and related activities, including exploration, extraction, processing and smelting. It conducts underground and surface mining operations at St. Ives, underground-only operations at Agnew, Granny Smith and South Deep and surface-only open pit mining at Damang, Tarkwa and Cerro Corona. The company's revenues are derived from the sale of gold that it produces.
Read more on GFI →About Monster Beverage Corp
Monster Beverage is a leader in the energy drink subsegment of the beverage industry. The Monster trademark anchors the portfolio, and notable offerings include Monster Energy and Monster Ultra. The firm has also started to incubate new trademarks for emerging enclaves of the energy space, like Reign in performance energy. It is primarily a brand owner, outsourcing most of its manufacturing processes to third-party copackers. It primarily uses the Coca-Cola bottling system for distribution after a strategic agreement in which Coke became Monster's largest shareholder (nearly 20%) and that also included the exchange of certain businesses between the two firms. Most of Monster's revenue is generated in the United States, though international geographies are increasing in the mix.
Read more on MNST →
