Compare Gold Fields Limited (GFI) vs Monster Beverage Corp (MNST) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Gold Fields Limited vs Monster Beverage Corp — how do they compare? Gold Fields Limited trades at $36.82 (market cap $31.87B), while Monster Beverage Corp trades at $43.64 (market cap $85.51B). The key difference: Monster Beverage Corp is far larger — about 2.7× Gold Fields Limited's market cap, and Gold Fields Limited pays a 6% dividend while Monster Beverage Corp pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Gold Fields Limited for 49 Days and Monster Beverage Corp for 72 Days on average.
| GFI | MNST | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $31.87B | $85.51B |
Volume | 4,169,651 | 8,569,709 |
Sector | Basic Materials | Consumer Staples |
52-Week High | $61.52 | $49.97 |
52-Week Low | $31.25 | $33.16 |
Typical Hold Time | 49 Days | 72 Days |
Enterprise Value | $32.47B | $83.81B |
Dividend Yield | 6% | — |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Gold Fields (GFI) trades at $35.86, up 2.31% today, amid a bearish technical signal and mixed earnings history. The stock shows strong fundamentals with a P/E of 7.3, net income margin of 38.66%, and robust cash flow growth, while recent news highlights a rejected $27 billion takeover bid for Northern Star, creating investor uncertainty.
The outlook is balanced: valuation metrics and profitability support upside toward the $52.75 analyst target, but near-term risks include acquisition-related volatility and technical weakness. Investors should weigh high ROE and cash returns against execution risks from expansion efforts.
Monster Beverage (MNST) trades at $43.65, up 1.8% with bullish technical signals and strong fundamentals. The stock shows consistent earnings beats with Q2 2026 EPS of $0.30 exceeding expectations. Revenue grew to $8.29B in 2025 with impressive 23.08% net margins and zero long-term debt. Recent 1:2 stock split on August 11, 2026, enhances accessibility while international sales surge 35% in Q2 2026.
MNST presents growth potential through international expansion and clean balance sheet, but faces valuation concerns with P/E of 40.42. Analyst consensus targets $98.22 (52% buy ratings) suggesting significant upside. Key risks include regulatory challenges in markets like India and competitive pressure from beverage giants. The stock's premium valuation requires sustained high growth to justify current levels.
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
About Gold Fields Limited
Gold Fields Ltd is a producer of gold and is a holder of gold reserves and resources in South Africa, Ghana, Australia and Peru. In Peru, the company also produces copper. The company is primarily involved in underground and surface gold and surface copper mining and silver and related activities, including exploration, extraction, processing and smelting. It conducts underground and surface mining operations at St. Ives, underground-only operations at Agnew, Granny Smith and South Deep and surface-only open pit mining at Damang, Tarkwa and Cerro Corona. The company's revenues are derived from the sale of gold that it produces.
Read more on GFI →About Monster Beverage Corp
Monster Beverage is a leader in the energy drink subsegment of the beverage industry. The Monster trademark anchors the portfolio, and notable offerings include Monster Energy and Monster Ultra. The firm has also started to incubate new trademarks for emerging enclaves of the energy space, like Reign in performance energy. It is primarily a brand owner, outsourcing most of its manufacturing processes to third-party copackers. It primarily uses the Coca-Cola bottling system for distribution after a strategic agreement in which Coke became Monster's largest shareholder (nearly 20%) and that also included the exchange of certain businesses between the two firms. Most of Monster's revenue is generated in the United States, though international geographies are increasing in the mix.
Read more on MNST →
