Gold Fields Limited vs Marathon Digital Holdings Inc — how do they compare? Gold Fields Limited trades at $40.86 (market cap $36.07B), while Marathon Digital Holdings Inc trades at $9.74 (market cap $3.74B). The key difference: Gold Fields Limited is far larger — about 9.6× Marathon Digital Holdings Inc's market cap, and Gold Fields Limited pays a 5.76% dividend while Marathon Digital Holdings Inc pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| GFI | MARA | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $36.07B | $3.74B |
Sector | Basic Materials | Technology |
52-Week High | $61.52 | $22.84 |
52-Week Low | $29.31 | $6.73 |
Enterprise Value | $37.51B | $5.78B |
Dividend Yield | 5.76% | — |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Gold Fields (GFI) trades at $41.06, down 0.16% on the day, with a bullish technical signal from moving averages but bearish oscillators. The company shows strong fundamentals with a P/E of 10.22, net income margin of 40.76%, and robust cash flow growth, with 2025 projections indicating revenue of $8.8B and net income of $3.6B. Recent news highlights institutional buying interest, such as Assenagon Asset Management's new position in Q2 2026.
The outlook for GFI is positive, supported by high profitability and growth projections, though risks include volatile gold prices and cost pressures. Analyst consensus is a Buy with a $52 price target, suggesting 27% upside. Investors should weigh strong cash generation against debt increases and market sentiment shifts.
MARA Holdings trades at $9.675, down 1.2% on the day, with a bearish technical signal and negative earnings trends. The company reported a Q2 2026 net loss of $1.60 per share, missing estimates, while revenue declined to $804 million in 2026. Despite a 50% analyst buy rating and a $16.08 consensus price target, profitability remains challenged with a -429.71% net income margin. Recent news highlights a strategic pivot toward AI digital infrastructure amid Bitcoin mining headwinds.
The outlook is mixed: valuation ratios like P/E of 3.37 suggest potential undervaluation, but persistent losses and high debt-to-asset ratio of 49.43% pose significant risks. Upside depends on successful execution of the AI infrastructure strategy, while downside risks include continued earnings misses and cryptocurrency market volatility.
Trailing returns across standard periods
Latest headlines on both assets
Gold Fields Ltd is a producer of gold and is a holder of gold reserves and resources in South Africa, Ghana, Australia and Peru. In Peru, the company also produces copper. The company is primarily involved in underground and surface gold and surface copper mining and silver and related activities, including exploration, extraction, processing and smelting. It conducts underground and surface mining operations at St. Ives, underground-only operations at Agnew, Granny Smith and South Deep and surface-only open pit mining at Damang, Tarkwa and Cerro Corona. The company's revenues are derived from the sale of gold that it produces.
Read more on GFI →Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. is one of the largest publicly traded Bitcoin mining companies in North America. The company focuses on building and operating large-scale, cost-efficient Bitcoin mining facilities. Marathon's strategy centers on increasing its mining hash rate and using sustainable energy sources to expand its Bitcoin production. The company's performance is closely tied to the price of Bitcoin and the overall health of the digital asset mining industry.
Read more on MARA →