Compare Gold Fields Limited (GFI) vs iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Gold Fields Limited vs iShares Russell 2000 ETF — how do they compare? Gold Fields Limited trades at $36.85 (market cap $31.87B), while iShares Russell 2000 ETF trades at $279.16 (market cap $77.70B). The key difference: iShares Russell 2000 ETF is far larger — about 2.4× Gold Fields Limited's market cap, and Gold Fields Limited pays a 6% dividend while iShares Russell 2000 ETF pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Gold Fields Limited for 49 Days and iShares Russell 2000 ETF for 83 Days on average.
| GFI | IWM | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $31.87B | $77.70B |
Volume | 4,169,651 | 35,598,983 |
Sector | Basic Materials | — |
52-Week High | $61.52 | $305.06 |
52-Week Low | $31.25 | $229.13 |
Typical Hold Time | 49 Days | 83 Days |
Enterprise Value | $32.47B | — |
Dividend Yield | 6% | — |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Gold Fields (GFI) trades at $36.70, up 4.71% over 24 hours, but technical indicators signal a bearish trend with price near support at $35. The company reported strong 2025 results with revenue of $8.75 billion and net income of $3.57 billion, yielding high profitability margins. However, recent earnings misses and a rejected $27 billion takeover bid for Northern Star have introduced volatility. Analyst consensus remains positive with a $52.75 price target, but the stock faces headwinds from acquisition-related uncertainty and mixed technical signals.
GFI presents a compelling value case with low P/E of 7.3 and robust cash flow growth, but investors must weigh execution risks from its aggressive M&A strategy and recent earnings inconsistencies against its strong fundamentals and shareholder returns. The stock's near-term direction hinges on merger outcomes and gold price stability.
IWM, the iShares Russell 2000 ETF tracking US small-cap stocks, trades at $279.1, up 0.5% on the day. Technical indicators are predominantly bearish, with moving averages and ADX signaling a downtrend, though oscillators like RSI are neutral. The fund lacks traditional valuation ratios as it is an ETF, and recent news highlights its underperformance versus the S&P 500 over the past decade, with concerns about its inclusion of unprofitable companies.
The outlook for IWM is clouded by persistent underperformance and sensitivity to interest rate hikes, which pressure small caps. While offering diversification away from large-cap tech, the fund faces headwinds from economic tightening and narrow market breadth. A rebound hinges on broader market participation and favorable macroeconomic conditions, but near-term risks remain elevated.
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
About Gold Fields Limited
Gold Fields Ltd is a producer of gold and is a holder of gold reserves and resources in South Africa, Ghana, Australia and Peru. In Peru, the company also produces copper. The company is primarily involved in underground and surface gold and surface copper mining and silver and related activities, including exploration, extraction, processing and smelting. It conducts underground and surface mining operations at St. Ives, underground-only operations at Agnew, Granny Smith and South Deep and surface-only open pit mining at Damang, Tarkwa and Cerro Corona. The company's revenues are derived from the sale of gold that it produces.
Read more on GFI →About iShares Russell 2000 ETF
The ETF is designed to track the performance of the securities and the stocks in the Russell 2000 Index. To maintain the composition and weightings, the advisor adjusts the ETF from time to time to conform to periodic changes in the index target.
Read more on IWM →
