Investment
Features
FeesSafety
Academy
More
Pluang+

Compare GE Vernova Inc (GEV) vs New York Times Co (NYT) Price & Performance

GE Vernova IncTrade
New York Times CoTrade

Price performance (Past 24H)

Key statistics

GE Vernova Inc vs New York Times Co — how do they compare? GE Vernova Inc trades at $1,019.98 (market cap $283.57B), while New York Times Co trades at $76.18 (market cap $12.18B). The key difference: GE Vernova Inc is far larger — about 23.3× New York Times Co's market cap, and New York Times Co pays the higher dividend (1.22%). Which is the better fit depends on your goals.

GEVNYT
Market Cap
$283.57B$12.18B
Sector
TechnologyMedia
52-Week High
$1.17K$85.86
52-Week Low
$547.96$51.43
Enterprise Value
$276.21B$11.57B
Dividend Yield
0.19%1.22%

Aura AI Summary

Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice

GE Vernova Inc

GE Vernova (GEV) stock trades at $1,021.20, down 4.2% over 24 hours, as it approaches its Q2 2026 earnings report on July 22. The technical picture is mixed, with a bearish overall signal but a bullish moving average crossover. Fundamentally, the company shows strong profitability with a 23.81% net margin and robust ROE of 83.23%, though valuation ratios like a P/E of 30.84 and EV/EBITDA of 109.82 appear elevated. Recent earnings have been volatile, with a significant beat in Q1 2026 but a miss in Q3 2025. Analyst sentiment remains overwhelmingly positive, with a 75% buy rating and a consensus price target of $1,260, representing over 23% upside. The company is positioned to benefit from AI-driven power demand and grid modernization, highlighted by recent news coverage and an $11 billion investment push.

The outlook for GEV is cautiously optimistic, driven by its leadership in power infrastructure and exposure to secular growth in AI and data center energy demand. Key opportunities include pricing power from scarce gas turbines, a massive global installed base, and growth in its nuclear segment with the BWRX-300 Small Modular Reactor. Primary risks include execution challenges in its Wind segment, high valuation multiples that leave little room for error, and potential volatility around earnings. The stock's recent decline may present a buying opportunity ahead of earnings for investors bullish on the long-term AI power theme.

New York Times Co

The New York Times (NYT) trades at $75.85, up 3.93% today, showing strong momentum with consistent earnings beats in recent quarters. Technicals are bullish with support at $75 and resistance at $76. Revenue grew to $2.82B in 2025, with net income margin expanding to 12.17%. The company maintains robust cash flow from operations at $584M and announced a $0.23 dividend payable July 23, 2026.

Outlook remains positive with Q2 2026 earnings expected at $0.67 EPS on August 5. Analysts project a $78 consensus target, though legal pressures from government subpoenas and OpenAI copyright disputes pose near-term risks. Valuation multiples like P/E of 32.28 suggest premium pricing relative to historical norms, requiring sustained growth to justify.

Returns comparison

Trailing returns across standard periods

Top news

Latest headlines on both assets

About GE Vernova Inc

GE Vernova is a global leader in the electric power industry. It provides sustainable energy solutions across gas, wind, and hydro sectors, focusing on modernizing the world's power grids.

Read more on GEV

About New York Times Co

New York Times Co is an American media company known for publishing its flagship newspaper, The New York Times. The company also operates the International New York Times newspaper, as well as digital properties such as nytimes and various smartphone applications. Circulation of The New York Times is the source of revenue for the company, followed by print and digital advertising and its paid digital-only subscription to The New York Times. The company has a daily print circulation of over 500,000 and 1,000,000 on Sundays. The source of growth for The New York Times is its digital subscription service, which has over 1,000,000 paid users.

Read more on NYT