VanEck Gold Miners ETF vs Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF — how do they compare? VanEck Gold Miners ETF trades at $88.64 (market cap $25.65B), while Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF trades at $28.29 (market cap $335.90M). The key difference: VanEck Gold Miners ETF is far larger — about 76.4× Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF's market cap, and VanEck Gold Miners ETF is trading nearer its 52-week high, Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF nearer its low. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold VanEck Gold Miners ETF for 76 Days and Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF for 46 Days on average.
| GDX | PBW | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $25.65B | $335.90M |
Volume | 16,534,046 | 628,890 |
52-Week High | $115.84 | $46.99 |
52-Week Low | $68.28 | $28.29 |
Typical Hold Time | 76 Days | 46 Days |
Sector | — | Sector/Thematic |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
GDX, the VanEck Gold Miners ETF, trades at $85.46, down 3.13% amid a bearish technical signal with 13 sell signals from moving averages. Recent news highlights pressure on gold miners from rising interest rates and silver's sharp decline, though some analysts see value in the sell-off. Key support lies at $84, with resistance at $86-87. The ETF offers exposure to gold mining equities but lacks disclosed fundamental ratios in this snapshot.
The outlook for GDX hinges on gold price direction and interest rate trends, with risks including metal volatility and macroeconomic headwinds. Opportunities exist if gold rebounds, but investor caution is warranted given technical weakness and mixed sentiment from institutional flows.
PBW, the Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF, trades at $28.92, down 2.89% today amid a bearish technical signal from moving averages. The ETF's unique selection criteria prioritize ecological factors over financial metrics, resulting in concentrated exposure to the clean energy sector. Recent institutional selling, including a 96.3% reduction by IFP Advisors Inc. in Q2 2026 (SEC filing, September 18, 2026), reflects cautious sentiment despite long-term growth drivers like energy security and data center demand.
Outlook remains challenged by near-term volatility and sector underperformance versus broad markets, though global investment in clean energy offers structural tailwinds. Key risks include oil price swings, Fed policy impacts, and lack of diversification. Investors face a trade-off between speculative growth potential and elevated sensitivity to macroeconomic shifts.
Trailing returns across standard periods
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Latest headlines on both assets
The fund normally invests at least 80% of its total assets in common stocks and depositary receipts of companies involved in the gold mining industry. The index is a modified market-capitalization weighted index primarily comprised of publicly traded companies involved in the mining for gold and silver. The fund is non-diversified.
Read more on GDX →PBW is an equal-weighted ETF that invests in U.S. companies leading the clean energy transition. It focuses on renewable energy, power conservation, and sustainable technologies like solar, wind, and energy storage.
Read more on PBW →