Compare VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) vs Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
VanEck Gold Miners ETF vs Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF — how do they compare? VanEck Gold Miners ETF trades at $89.25 (market cap $25.65B), while Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF trades at $73.78 (market cap $5.78B). The key difference: VanEck Gold Miners ETF is far larger — about 4.4× Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF's market cap, and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF is trading nearer its 52-week high, VanEck Gold Miners ETF nearer its low. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold VanEck Gold Miners ETF for 76 Days and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF for 36 Days on average.
| GDX | MAGS | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $25.65B | $5.78B |
Volume | 16,534,046 | 4,410,665 |
52-Week High | $115.84 | $73.90 |
52-Week Low | $68.28 | $55.39 |
Typical Hold Time | 76 Days | 36 Days |
Sector | — | Sector/Thematic |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
GDX trades at $89.31, up 4.51% over the past 24 hours, but technical indicators signal a bearish trend with moving averages and ADX pointing lower. The ETF faces headwinds from rising interest rates pressuring dividend stocks and a recent sell-off in metals. Support levels are clustered between $84 and $86, while resistance sits near $87 to $89. Recent news highlights institutional selling by firms like Allworth Financial and HB Wealth Management, though Ameritas Advisory Services increased its stake.
The outlook for GDX is cautious due to bearish technicals and macroeconomic pressures on gold miners. Opportunities exist if gold prices rebound, but risks include persistent rate hikes and volatility in commodity markets. Investors should weigh the ETF's leverage to gold against operational risks in the mining sector.
MAGS (Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF) trades at $73.63, down slightly by 0.08% with a bullish technical signal from moving averages. The ETF provides equal-weighted exposure to seven mega-cap tech leaders, though it has underperformed the broader market in 2026 with only 2% year-to-date gains. Recent news highlights ongoing investor debate about the Magnificent Seven's leadership role amid shifting AI investment trends.
The ETF faces near-term pressure from underperformance versus the S&P 500 but maintains long-term growth potential through diversified tech exposure. Key risks include concentration in seven stocks and market rotation away from mega-caps, while the bullish technical setup suggests potential for near-term recovery if AI momentum continues.
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
About VanEck Gold Miners ETF
The fund normally invests at least 80% of its total assets in common stocks and depositary receipts of companies involved in the gold mining industry. The index is a modified market-capitalization weighted index primarily comprised of publicly traded companies involved in the mining for gold and silver. The fund is non-diversified.
Read more on GDX →About Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF
MAGS is an ETF that provides concentrated exposure to the seven technology-focused mega-cap companies often referred to as the 'Magnificent Seven' (Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Meta, Microsoft, NVIDIA, and Tesla). The fund is designed to capture the performance of these market-leading stocks, which have been the primary drivers of market returns. It offers a simple way for investors to invest solely in this select group of high-growth technology companies.
Read more on MAGS →
