Investment
Features
FeesSafety
Academy
More
Pluang+

Compare General Dynamics Corporation (GD) vs Thomson Reuters Corp (TRI) Price & Performance

General Dynamics CorporationTrade
Thomson Reuters CorpTrade

Price performance (Past 24H)

Key statistics

General Dynamics Corporation vs Thomson Reuters Corp — how do they compare? General Dynamics Corporation trades at $392 (market cap $107.13B), while Thomson Reuters Corp trades at $104.52 (market cap $45.08B). The key difference: General Dynamics Corporation is far larger — about 2.4× Thomson Reuters Corp's market cap, and Thomson Reuters Corp pays the higher dividend (2.51%). Which is the better fit depends on your goals.

GDTRI
Market Cap
$107.13B$45.08B
Sector
IndustrialsIndustrials
52-Week High
$395.97$178.77
52-Week Low
$312.53$76.55
Enterprise Value
$112.28B$47.69B
Dividend Yield
1.61%2.51%

Aura AI Summary

Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice

General Dynamics Corporation

General Dynamics (GD) trades at $392.05, up 1.33% today, with a bullish technical outlook supported by moving averages and strong earnings beats in recent quarters. The company reported Q2 2026 EPS of $4.24 versus $3.96 expected, with revenue growth across all segments. A $76.6 billion Navy contract awarded in July 2026 bolsters its backlog to $136.5 billion, providing visibility for future growth.

The stock offers upside to the $427.40 consensus price target, driven by defense spending tailwinds and operational execution. Risks include valuation at a 23.91 P/E and potential contract execution delays. Analyst sentiment is positive with 57% buy ratings, but overbought RSI levels near-term may limit gains.

Thomson Reuters Corp

Thomson Reuters (TRI) trades at $101.83, up 1.68% today, near the consensus price target of $102.33. The stock shows strong technical momentum with bullish moving averages and support at $99. Fundamentally, TRI delivered Q2 2026 earnings beat ($0.99 vs. $0.96 expected) with 8% organic revenue growth, while maintaining robust profitability margins (21.22% net income margin). Recent news highlights AI-driven product momentum and raised full-year revenue guidance.

Outlook remains positive with analyst consensus favoring Buy (51.85%) and 29.8% upside potential to high target of $124. Key risks include execution on AI transition and competitive pressures in legal/tax software markets. The company's recurring revenue model (82% of total) and dividend payments provide stability amid growth initiatives.

Returns comparison

Trailing returns across standard periods

Top news

Latest headlines on both assets

About General Dynamics Corporation

General Dynamics is a defense contractor and business jet manufacturer. The firm's segments include aerospace, combat systems, marine, and technologies. The company's aerospace segment creates Gulfstream business jets. Combat system produces land-based combat vehicles, such as the M1 Abrams tank. The marine subsegment creates nuclear-powered submarines, among other things. The technologies segment contains two main units, an IT business that primarily serves the government market and a mission systems business that focuses on products that provide command, control, computers, intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance capabilities to the military.

Read more on GD

About Thomson Reuters Corp

Thomson Reuters is the result of the $17.6 billion megamerger of Canada's Thomson and the United Kingdom's Reuters Group in 2008 and the 2018 carve-out of its finance and risk business, Refinitiv, in which it holds a 45% stake. In 2019, the company agreed to exchange its 45% stake in Refinitiv for a 15% stake in LSE, which closed in early 2021. Since the divestiture, the company is more concentrated on selling its flagship legal data and software, Westlaw, and its tax accounting software, Onesource. Reuters sees roughly 80% of revenue and 70% of expenses attributed to the United States, while the remainder (largely through the global print and Reuters News segments) is distributed across Latin America, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and Asia-Pacific.

Read more on TRI