General Dynamics Corporation vs New York Times Co — how do they compare? General Dynamics Corporation trades at $391.11 (market cap $106.03B), while New York Times Co trades at $63.97 (market cap $10.28B). The key difference: General Dynamics Corporation is far larger — about 10.3× New York Times Co's market cap, and General Dynamics Corporation pays the higher dividend (1.62%). Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| GD | NYT | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $106.03B | $10.28B |
Sector | Industrials | Media |
52-Week High | $395.97 | $85.86 |
52-Week Low | $312.53 | $54.66 |
Enterprise Value | $111.17B | $9.67B |
Dividend Yield | 1.62% | 1.44% |
Trailing returns across standard periods
Latest headlines on both assets
General Dynamics is a defense contractor and business jet manufacturer. The firm's segments include aerospace, combat systems, marine, and technologies. The company's aerospace segment creates Gulfstream business jets. Combat system produces land-based combat vehicles, such as the M1 Abrams tank. The marine subsegment creates nuclear-powered submarines, among other things. The technologies segment contains two main units, an IT business that primarily serves the government market and a mission systems business that focuses on products that provide command, control, computers, intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance capabilities to the military.
Read more on GD →New York Times Co is an American media company known for publishing its flagship newspaper, The New York Times. The company also operates the International New York Times newspaper, as well as digital properties such as nytimes and various smartphone applications. Circulation of The New York Times is the source of revenue for the company, followed by print and digital advertising and its paid digital-only subscription to The New York Times. The company has a daily print circulation of over 500,000 and 1,000,000 on Sundays. The source of growth for The New York Times is its digital subscription service, which has over 1,000,000 paid users.
Read more on NYT →