Compare General Dynamics Corporation (GD) vs Garmin Ltd. (GRMN) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
General Dynamics Corporation vs Garmin Ltd. — how do they compare? General Dynamics Corporation trades at $391.11 (market cap $106.03B), while Garmin Ltd. trades at $309.51 (market cap $59.72B). The key difference: General Dynamics Corporation is the larger of the two by market cap, and General Dynamics Corporation pays the higher dividend (1.62%). Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| GD | GRMN | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $106.03B | $59.72B |
Sector | Industrials | Technology |
52-Week High | $395.97 | $313.16 |
52-Week Low | $312.53 | $187.10 |
Enterprise Value | $111.17B | $57.23B |
Dividend Yield | 1.62% | 1.36% |
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
About General Dynamics Corporation
General Dynamics is a defense contractor and business jet manufacturer. The firm's segments include aerospace, combat systems, marine, and technologies. The company's aerospace segment creates Gulfstream business jets. Combat system produces land-based combat vehicles, such as the M1 Abrams tank. The marine subsegment creates nuclear-powered submarines, among other things. The technologies segment contains two main units, an IT business that primarily serves the government market and a mission systems business that focuses on products that provide command, control, computers, intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance capabilities to the military.
Read more on GD →About Garmin Ltd.
Garmin produces GPS-enabled hardware and software for five verticals: fitness, outdoors, auto, aviation, and marine. The company relies on licensing mapping data to enable its hardware specialized for often niche activities like scuba diving or sailing. Garmin operates in 100 countries and sells its products via distributors as well as relationships with original equipment manufacturers.
Read more on GRMN →
