iShares China Large-Cap ETF vs Monster Beverage Corp — how do they compare? iShares China Large-Cap ETF trades at $35.37, while Monster Beverage Corp trades at $45.58 (market cap $89.20B). The key difference: Monster Beverage Corp is trading nearer its 52-week high, iShares China Large-Cap ETF nearer its low. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| FXI | MNST | |
|---|---|---|
52-Week High | $41.75 | $49.97 |
52-Week Low | $31.59 | $30.86 |
Market Cap | — | $89.20B |
Sector | — | Consumer Staples |
Enterprise Value | — | $87.49B |
Trailing returns across standard periods
Latest headlines on both assets
The fund generally will invest at least 80% of its assets in the component securities of its underlying index and in investments that have economic characteristics that are substantially identical to the component securities of its underlying index. The index designed to measure the performance of the largest companies in the Chinese equity market that trade on the Stock Exchange of Hong Kong and are available to international investors. The fund is non-diversified.
Read more on FXI →Monster Beverage is a leader in the energy drink subsegment of the beverage industry. The Monster trademark anchors the portfolio, and notable offerings include Monster Energy and Monster Ultra. The firm has also started to incubate new trademarks for emerging enclaves of the energy space, like Reign in performance energy. It is primarily a brand owner, outsourcing most of its manufacturing processes to third-party copackers. It primarily uses the Coca-Cola bottling system for distribution after a strategic agreement in which Coke became Monster's largest shareholder (nearly 20%) and that also included the exchange of certain businesses between the two firms. Most of Monster's revenue is generated in the United States, though international geographies are increasing in the mix.
Read more on MNST →