Compare iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI) vs iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
iShares China Large-Cap ETF vs iShares Global Clean Energy ETF — how do they compare? iShares China Large-Cap ETF trades at $34.19 (market cap $3.86B), while iShares Global Clean Energy ETF trades at $17.25 (market cap $2.27B). The key difference: iShares China Large-Cap ETF is the larger of the two by market cap, and iShares China Large-Cap ETF is more actively traded (16,323,837 versus 6,845,064). Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold iShares China Large-Cap ETF for 149 Days and iShares Global Clean Energy ETF for 87 Days on average.
| FXI | ICLN | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $3.86B | $2.27B |
Volume | 16,323,837 | 6,845,064 |
52-Week High | $41.08 | $23.75 |
52-Week Low | $31.59 | $15.78 |
Typical Hold Time | 149 Days | 87 Days |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
FXI (iShares China Large-Cap ETF) trades at $34.30, up 2.63% on the day, but technical indicators signal a bearish trend with 17 sell signals versus 1 buy. The ETF faces headwinds from China's economic challenges and geopolitical tensions, though some analysts highlight its attractive valuation at half the S&P 500's P/E ratio. Recent news focuses on U.S.-China relations and export dynamics.
The outlook remains cautious due to China's industrial overcapacity and weak domestic consumption. While valuation appears compelling, political risks and technical weakness suggest limited near-term upside. Investors should weigh the discount against ongoing macroeconomic pressures in China.
ICLN trades at $17.17, down 0.81% with bearish technical signals from moving averages. The ETF shows neutral momentum oscillators but faces significant volatility compared to traditional energy peers. Recent news highlights ICLN's 57.2% maximum drawdown and higher expense ratio of 0.38% versus fossil fuel ETFs, though geopolitical tensions are driving renewed interest in renewable energy infrastructure.
The clean energy sector faces competitive pressure from higher-yielding traditional energy ETFs, but long-term growth prospects remain supported by global energy transition trends. Key risks include expense ratio disadvantages and sector volatility, while potential catalysts include increased renewable adoption driven by geopolitical and environmental factors.
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
About iShares China Large-Cap ETF
The fund generally will invest at least 80% of its assets in the component securities of its underlying index and in investments that have economic characteristics that are substantially identical to the component securities of its underlying index. The index designed to measure the performance of the largest companies in the Chinese equity market that trade on the Stock Exchange of Hong Kong and are available to international investors. The fund is non-diversified.
Read more on FXI →About iShares Global Clean Energy ETF
The index is designed to track the performance of approximately 100 clean energy-related companies. The fund generally invests at least 80% of its assets in the component securities of the target index. The index may invest up to 20% of its assets in certain futures, trading options and swap contracts, cash and cash equivalents, as well as in securities not included in the index. It is non-diversified.
Read more on ICLN →
