Fastly Inc vs ProShares UltraPro QQQ ETF — how do they compare? Fastly Inc trades at $29.3 (market cap $4.03B), while ProShares UltraPro QQQ ETF trades at $81.28 (market cap $38.74B). The key difference: ProShares UltraPro QQQ ETF is far larger — about 9.6× Fastly Inc's market cap, and ProShares UltraPro QQQ ETF is more actively traded (65,384,797 versus 5,516,495). Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Fastly Inc for 26 Days and ProShares UltraPro QQQ ETF for 24 Days on average.
| FSLY | TQQQ | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $4.03B | $38.74B |
Volume | 5,516,495 | 65,384,797 |
Sector | Technology | Leveraged / Inverse |
52-Week High | $33.50 | $87.22 |
52-Week Low | $7.86 | $37.89 |
Typical Hold Time | 26 Days | 24 Days |
Enterprise Value | $4.09B | — |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Fastly (FSLY) trades at $25.29, showing minimal daily movement (+0.04%) with neutral technical indicators. The company has demonstrated strong revenue growth, reaching $624 million in 2025, and has beaten earnings expectations for three consecutive quarters. However, profitability remains a concern with negative net income margins (-11.8%) and ROE (-8.39%). Recent insider selling by the CTO and CEO has created some investor uncertainty despite positive AI-related business developments.
The outlook for FSLY is cautiously optimistic with analyst consensus pointing to 12% upside to the $28.25 price target. Key opportunities include AI-driven edge computing demand and revenue growth trajectory toward $1.1-1.3 billion by 2029. Major risks include persistent profitability challenges, competitive pressure in cloud infrastructure, and execution risks in achieving long-term targets amid insider selling activity.
TQQQ trades at $81.28, down 2.78% on the day, with technical indicators showing a bullish bias despite recent selling pressure. The ETF maintains a strong position near its pivot point of $81, supported by positive moving average signals. Recent news highlights ongoing institutional interest alongside concerns about hidden costs and volatility risks inherent in leveraged ETF structures.
The outlook remains cautiously optimistic given the bullish technical setup, though investors face significant volatility risks amplified by the 3x leverage structure. Key opportunities include exposure to Nasdaq-100 growth, while risks center on expense ratios, financing costs, and potential market corrections that could magnify losses.
Trailing returns across standard periods
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Latest headlines on both assets
Fastly operates a content delivery network, which is necessary for entities to provide faster and more reliable online content. Fastly's strategy differs from traditional CDNs, which focused on locating servers in as many locations as possible to store copies of files that consumers most use. Fastly has far fewer sites than traditional CDNs, but it houses servers in the most network-dense data centers. Instead of simply storing static content, it allows its customers to program on its platform, enabling edge computing and better service of the more dynamic content that was traditionally not well served by CDNs. Fastly gears its service to the largest, most sophisticated enterprises rather than small companies and generated about two thirds of its revenue in the United States in 2020.
Read more on FSLY →TQQQ is a leveraged ETF that seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to three times (3x) the daily performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index. It is one of the most liquid and actively traded instruments in the market, designed for sophisticated traders to amplify short-term bullish exposure to large-cap non-financial growth stocks, predominantly in the technology and communication sectors.
Read more on TQQQ →