Investment
Features
FeesSafety
Academy
More
Pluang+

Compare Freshworks Inc (FRSH) vs New York Times Co (NYT) Price & Performance

Freshworks IncTrade
New York Times CoTrade

Price performance (Past 24H)

Key statistics

Freshworks Inc vs New York Times Co — how do they compare? Freshworks Inc trades at $13.9 (market cap $3.56B), while New York Times Co trades at $66.32 (market cap $10.74B). The key difference: New York Times Co is far larger — about 3× Freshworks Inc's market cap, and New York Times Co pays a 1.38% dividend while Freshworks Inc pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Freshworks Inc for 39 Days and New York Times Co for 81 Days on average.

FRSHNYT
Market Cap
$3.56B$10.74B
Volume
9,066,4542,096,352
Sector
TechnologyMedia
52-Week High
$13.92$85.86
52-Week Low
$6.88$54.66
Typical Hold Time
39 Days81 Days
Enterprise Value
$2.93B$10.14B
Dividend Yield
—1.38%

Aura AI Summary

Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice

Freshworks Inc

Freshworks (FRSH) trades at $13.92, up 2.35% today, with strong technical momentum and bullish moving averages. The company achieved its first GAAP profitability in Q2 2026, beating earnings expectations with $0.17 EPS versus $0.13 expected. Revenue growth remains robust at 16% year-over-year, while valuation metrics show a P/E of 21.63 and P/S of 4.28. Recent developments include FedRAMP certification progress and leadership appointments.

The outlook appears positive with analyst consensus at $14.60 price target and 50% buy ratings. Key opportunities include AI monetization and enterprise growth, while risks involve competitive SaaS market pressure and the need to sustain recent profitability gains amid ongoing investments.

New York Times Co

The New York Times Company (NYT) trades at $66.32, up 2.19% today, with strong fundamental performance including consistent earnings beats and revenue growth from $2.3B in 2022 to $2.8B in 2025. The stock shows a bullish technical signal with key support at $65-66 and resistance at $67-68, while maintaining robust profitability with 51.41% gross margins and 13.19% net income margin. Recent developments include a declared $0.23 dividend and ongoing AI copyright litigation.

Outlook remains positive with analyst consensus target of $84 representing 27% upside potential, though risks include the shareholder lawsuit alleging bias and competitive pressures in digital media. The company's strong cash flow generation and dividend payments provide shareholder value, while earnings growth trajectory supports continued valuation expansion if execution remains solid.

Returns comparison

Trailing returns across standard periods

Investor sentiment on Pluang

What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days

FRSH
0% Buy100% Sell
Avg holding period · 39 Days
NYT
13% Buy87% Sell
Avg holding period · 81 Days

Top news

Latest headlines on both assets

About Freshworks Inc

Freshworks Inc provides software as a service platform that enables small and medium-sized businesses to support customers through e-mail, phone, website, and social networks. It offers solutions that serve the needs of users in the CX and ITSM categories, and have also expanded its offering with Sales and Marketing automation products. These product offerings enable organizations to acquire, engage, and better serve their customers and employees.

Read more on FRSH →

About New York Times Co

New York Times Co is an American media company known for publishing its flagship newspaper, The New York Times. The company also operates the International New York Times newspaper, as well as digital properties such as nytimes and various smartphone applications. Circulation of The New York Times is the source of revenue for the company, followed by print and digital advertising and its paid digital-only subscription to The New York Times. The company has a daily print circulation of over 500,000 and 1,000,000 on Sundays. The source of growth for The New York Times is its digital subscription service, which has over 1,000,000 paid users.

Read more on NYT →