Fluor Corporation Common Stock vs Smith & Nephew plc — how do they compare? Fluor Corporation Common Stock trades at $51.11 (market cap $6.82B), while Smith & Nephew plc trades at $27.21 (market cap $11.10B). The key difference: Smith & Nephew plc is the larger of the two by market cap, and Smith & Nephew plc pays a 2.95% dividend while Fluor Corporation Common Stock pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Fluor Corporation Common Stock for 0 Days and Smith & Nephew plc for 120 Days on average.
| FLR | SNN | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $6.82B | $11.10B |
Volume | 1,748,454 | 1,051,703 |
Sector | Industrials | Health |
52-Week High | $57.50 | $37.17 |
52-Week Low | $39.63 | $26.42 |
Typical Hold Time | 0 Days | 120 Days |
Enterprise Value | $4.85B | $14.13B |
Dividend Yield | — | 2.95% |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
No Aura AI signal available yet.
Smith & Nephew (SNN) trades at $26.89, near its 52-week low, with a bearish technical signal. Revenue grew to $6.16B in 2025, with net income margin improving to 10.08%. Recent product launches, like the EVOS PELVIC System, aim to strengthen its medical technology portfolio, though the stock faces headwinds from analyst downgrades and CFO departure news.
The outlook is cautious; while fundamentals show profitability growth, the stock's proximity to lows and mixed analyst sentiment (26% buy, 65% hold) suggest limited near-term upside. Key risks include competitive pressures and execution challenges, but the stable dividend and institutional interest offer some support for patient investors.
Trailing returns across standard periods
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
No sentiment data available yet.
Fluor provides engineering, procurement, construction, and maintenance services. It works across energy, infrastructure, mining, advanced technology, manufacturing, life sciences, and government projects.
Read more on FLR →Smith & Nephew designs, manufactures, and markets orthopedic devices, sports medicine and arthroscopic technologies, and wound-care solutions. Roughly 42% of the U.K.-based firm's revenue comes from orthopedic products, and another 30% is sports medicine and ENT. The remaining 28% of revenue is from the advanced wound therapy segment. Roughly half of Smith & Nephew's total revenue comes from the United States, just over 30% is from other developed markets, and emerging markets account for the remainder.
Read more on SNN →