Investment
Features
FeesSafety
Academy
More
Pluang+

Compare National Beverage Corp. (FIZZ) vs Materials Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLB) Price & Performance

National Beverage Corp.Trade
Materials Select Sector SPDR FundTrade

Price performance (Past 24H)

Key statistics

National Beverage Corp. vs Materials Select Sector SPDR Fund — how do they compare? National Beverage Corp. trades at $30.61 (market cap $2.89B), while Materials Select Sector SPDR Fund trades at $49.42 (market cap $7.73B). The key difference: Materials Select Sector SPDR Fund is far larger — about 2.7× National Beverage Corp.'s market cap, and Materials Select Sector SPDR Fund is trading nearer its 52-week high, National Beverage Corp. nearer its low. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold National Beverage Corp. for 33 Days and Materials Select Sector SPDR Fund for 70 Days on average.

FIZZXLB
Market Cap
$2.89B$7.73B
Volume
553,95013,681,146
Sector
Consumer Staples—
52-Week High
$37.73$53.67
52-Week Low
$29.20$42.23
Typical Hold Time
33 Days70 Days
Enterprise Value
$2.84B—

Aura AI Summary

Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice

National Beverage Corp.

National Beverage Corp. (FIZZ) trades at $30.36, up 2.57% today, showing mixed signals with a bullish technical outlook but bearish analyst sentiment. The stock faces margin pressure with recent earnings misses and declining revenue growth, though profitability metrics remain strong with 14.81% net margin and 40.13% ROE. Recent news highlights institutional buying and a $3.25 special dividend payment.

FIZZ presents a cautious investment case with strong profitability offset by growth challenges. The company's high ROE and solid margins provide fundamental support, but consecutive earnings misses and tariff-related margin compression create near-term headwinds. Analyst consensus leans bearish with 50% sell ratings, suggesting limited upside potential despite technical strength.

Materials Select Sector SPDR Fund

XLB, the Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF, trades at $49.55, up 1.16% today, but technical indicators signal a bearish trend with moving averages and ADX pointing lower. The fund is heavily concentrated in chemicals (49% of assets) and faces cyclical pressures, with recent news highlighting sector volatility amid AI-driven infrastructure demand. Key support sits at $48, while resistance is at $50.

The outlook for XLB is cautious due to sector overvaluation concerns and bearish technicals. Opportunities lie in long-term infrastructure trends, but risks include economic sensitivity and high concentration. Investors should weigh cyclical exposure against potential growth from manufacturing and AI-related material demand.

Returns comparison

Trailing returns across standard periods

About National Beverage Corp.

National Beverage Corp is one of the top 10 non-alcoholic beverage companies in the U.S. Its portfolio skews toward functional drinks (that is those purporting to offer health benefits) and is anchored by the popular LaCroix sparkling water trademark. Other offerings include Rip It energy drinks, Everfresh juices, and soda brands like Shasta and Faygo. The firm controls most of its production and distribution apparatus, with very little outsourcing. In terms of go-to-market, it uses warehouse distribution for big-box retailers, direct-store-delivery for convenience stores and other small outlets, and food-service distributors for the food-service channel (schools, hospitals, restaurants). It is controlled by chairman and CEO Nick Caporella, who owns over 73% of the common stock.

Read more on FIZZ →

About Materials Select Sector SPDR Fund

In seeking to track the performance of the index, the fund employs a replication strategy. It generally invests substantially all, but at least 95%, of its total assets in the securities comprising the index. The index includes securities of companies from the following industries: chemicals; metals and mining; paper and forest products; containers and packaging; and construction materials. The fund is non-diversified.

Read more on XLB →