National Beverage Corp. vs Viatris Inc — how do they compare? National Beverage Corp. trades at $30.88 (market cap $2.77B), while Viatris Inc trades at $17.4 (market cap $20.12B). The key difference: Viatris Inc is far larger — about 7.3× National Beverage Corp.'s market cap, and Viatris Inc pays a 2.74% dividend while National Beverage Corp. pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold National Beverage Corp. for 33 Days and Viatris Inc for 57 Days on average.
| FIZZ | VTRS | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $2.77B | $20.12B |
Volume | 413,496 | 7,543,511 |
Sector | Consumer Staples | Health |
52-Week High | $37.73 | $18.27 |
52-Week Low | $29.20 | $9.74 |
Typical Hold Time | 33 Days | 57 Days |
Enterprise Value | $2.72B | $32.24B |
Dividend Yield | — | 2.74% |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
FIZZ trades at $29.60, down 1.4% with bearish technical signals from moving averages. The company reported flat revenue of $1.2B in 2025 but maintained strong profitability with 36.2% gross margins and 40.1% ROE. Recent Q1 2027 results showed the first year-over-year revenue growth since Q1 2026, though margins compressed to 35% and EPS declined to $0.50. Analyst sentiment is cautious with 50% sell ratings amid concerns about stalled growth and margin pressure from input costs.
The outlook remains challenging with LaCroix volumes declining for four consecutive years and Trump tariffs impacting profitability. While valuation multiples appear reasonable (P/E 15.9, EV/EBITDA 11.3), the lack of clear growth catalysts and negative cash flow trends present headwinds. The $3.25 special dividend provides shareholder return but reduces equity base, highlighting the company's mature market position.
Viatris (VTRS) trades at $17.44, down 0.57% on the day, with a bullish technical signal from moving averages and oversold RSI levels. The company has beaten earnings estimates for three consecutive quarters, with Q2 2026 EPS of $0.69 exceeding expectations. Revenue trends show a slight decline from $16.3B in 2022 to $14.3B in 2025, but net losses have widened significantly, reaching -$3.51B in 2025. Positive cash flow generation and a dividend payment scheduled for September 2026 highlight financial stability amid profitability challenges.
The outlook for VTRS is mixed; analyst consensus is a 'Buy' with a $22.17 price target, implying 27% upside, supported by strong cash flow and recent product approvals. However, persistent net losses, high P/E ratio of 236.2, and substantial long-term debt of $14.04B pose risks. Investors should weigh the potential for operational turnaround against ongoing profitability concerns and competitive pressures in the healthcare sector.
Trailing returns across standard periods
Latest headlines on both assets
National Beverage Corp is one of the top 10 non-alcoholic beverage companies in the U.S. Its portfolio skews toward functional drinks (that is those purporting to offer health benefits) and is anchored by the popular LaCroix sparkling water trademark. Other offerings include Rip It energy drinks, Everfresh juices, and soda brands like Shasta and Faygo. The firm controls most of its production and distribution apparatus, with very little outsourcing. In terms of go-to-market, it uses warehouse distribution for big-box retailers, direct-store-delivery for convenience stores and other small outlets, and food-service distributors for the food-service channel (schools, hospitals, restaurants). It is controlled by chairman and CEO Nick Caporella, who owns over 73% of the common stock.
Read more on FIZZ →Formed by the combination of Mylan and Pfizer's Upjohn business in 2020, Viatris is one of the world's largest generic drug manufacturers, with a substantial off-patent branded drug portfolio. Its portfolio consists of more than 1,400 molecules with penetration across most of the developed world and in select emerging markets. The company's branded drug portfolio consists of off-patent blockbuster drugs that continue to generate strong sales, including Lipitor, Norvasc, Lyrica, Viagra, and EpiPen. While global competition has facilitated the commodification of small-molecule generic drugs, the company has demonstrated an edge over peers in its ability to manufacture complex generics (for example, generic Advair and Copaxone).
Read more on VTRS →