Compare National Beverage Corp. (FIZZ) vs Monster Beverage Corp (MNST) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
National Beverage Corp. vs Monster Beverage Corp — how do they compare? National Beverage Corp. trades at $30.88 (market cap $2.89B), while Monster Beverage Corp trades at $43.71 (market cap $85.51B). The key difference: Monster Beverage Corp is far larger — about 29.6× National Beverage Corp.'s market cap, and Monster Beverage Corp is trading nearer its 52-week high, National Beverage Corp. nearer its low. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold National Beverage Corp. for 33 Days and Monster Beverage Corp for 72 Days on average.
| FIZZ | MNST | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $2.89B | $85.51B |
Volume | 553,950 | 8,569,709 |
Sector | Consumer Staples | Consumer Staples |
52-Week High | $37.73 | $49.97 |
52-Week Low | $29.20 | $33.16 |
Typical Hold Time | 33 Days | 72 Days |
Enterprise Value | $2.84B | $83.81B |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
FIZZ trades at $29.60, down 1.4% with bearish technical signals. The company reported stagnant $1.2B revenue but improved net margins to 15.55% in 2025. Recent earnings misses and a $3.25 special dividend highlight mixed performance. Technical indicators show strong bearish momentum with support at $29 and resistance at $30.
Outlook remains challenged by margin pressure and growth stagnation. While strong profitability metrics (40% ROE) provide support, analyst sentiment is cautious with 50% sell ratings. Key risks include competitive pressures and input cost inflation affecting gross margins.
Monster Beverage (MNST) trades at $42.88, down 0.86% on the day, with technical indicators showing bearish momentum despite strong fundamental performance. The company reported robust Q2 2026 earnings, beating estimates with $0.30 EPS, and maintains impressive profitability metrics including 55.55% gross margin and 23.08% net income margin. Recent news highlights Monster's debt-free balance sheet and international expansion driving 35% overseas sales growth.
While valuation multiples appear elevated (P/E 39.7, P/S 9.18), Monster's consistent earnings beats and analyst consensus price target of $98.22 suggest significant upside potential. Key risks include regulatory challenges in international markets and competitive pressures, but the company's strong cash flow generation and market position support long-term growth prospects.
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
About National Beverage Corp.
National Beverage Corp is one of the top 10 non-alcoholic beverage companies in the U.S. Its portfolio skews toward functional drinks (that is those purporting to offer health benefits) and is anchored by the popular LaCroix sparkling water trademark. Other offerings include Rip It energy drinks, Everfresh juices, and soda brands like Shasta and Faygo. The firm controls most of its production and distribution apparatus, with very little outsourcing. In terms of go-to-market, it uses warehouse distribution for big-box retailers, direct-store-delivery for convenience stores and other small outlets, and food-service distributors for the food-service channel (schools, hospitals, restaurants). It is controlled by chairman and CEO Nick Caporella, who owns over 73% of the common stock.
Read more on FIZZ →About Monster Beverage Corp
Monster Beverage is a leader in the energy drink subsegment of the beverage industry. The Monster trademark anchors the portfolio, and notable offerings include Monster Energy and Monster Ultra. The firm has also started to incubate new trademarks for emerging enclaves of the energy space, like Reign in performance energy. It is primarily a brand owner, outsourcing most of its manufacturing processes to third-party copackers. It primarily uses the Coca-Cola bottling system for distribution after a strategic agreement in which Coke became Monster's largest shareholder (nearly 20%) and that also included the exchange of certain businesses between the two firms. Most of Monster's revenue is generated in the United States, though international geographies are increasing in the mix.
Read more on MNST →
