National Beverage Corp. vs Monster Beverage Corp — how do they compare? National Beverage Corp. trades at $30.9 (market cap $2.91B), while Monster Beverage Corp trades at $45.6 (market cap $89.56B). The key difference: Monster Beverage Corp is far larger — about 30.8× National Beverage Corp.'s market cap, and Monster Beverage Corp is trading nearer its 52-week high, National Beverage Corp. nearer its low. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| FIZZ | MNST | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $2.91B | $89.56B |
Sector | Consumer Cyclical | Consumer Staples |
52-Week High | $46.75 | $49.97 |
52-Week Low | $30.53 | $30.86 |
Enterprise Value | $2.62B | $87.85B |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
FIZZ trades at $32.13, up 0.53% today, with neutral technical signals and mixed earnings performance. The company reported $1.20B revenue and $186.82M net income for 2025, maintaining strong profitability margins. Recent news highlights a special $3.25 dividend announcement amid concerns about LaCroix brand stagnation and competitive pressures.
The stock faces headwinds from declining volumes and muted growth prospects, offset by shareholder returns via dividends. Analyst sentiment is cautious with 50% sell ratings. Key risks include consumer weakness and tariff impacts, while valuation at 15.84x P/E appears reasonable given current fundamentals.
Monster Beverage (MNST) trades at $45.18, down 4.04% in the last 24 hours, with a bearish technical signal. The company reported strong Q2 2026 earnings, beating estimates with $0.60 EPS and record sales of $2.54 billion, driven by international growth. Financials show robust revenue growth from $8.29 billion in 2025 to a projected $9.2 billion in 2026, with net income margins above 23%. A 2-for-1 stock split is scheduled for August 11, 2026.
Outlook remains positive due to consistent earnings beats and global expansion, but high valuation ratios like a P/E of 41.83 pose risks. Analyst consensus is bullish with a $51.14 price target, though competition and economic sensitivity could pressure margins. Investors should weigh growth potential against premium valuation.
Trailing returns across standard periods
Latest headlines on both assets
National Beverage Corp is one of the top 10 non-alcoholic beverage companies in the U.S. Its portfolio skews toward functional drinks (that is those purporting to offer health benefits) and is anchored by the popular LaCroix sparkling water trademark. Other offerings include Rip It energy drinks, Everfresh juices, and soda brands like Shasta and Faygo. The firm controls most of its production and distribution apparatus, with very little outsourcing. In terms of go-to-market, it uses warehouse distribution for big-box retailers, direct-store-delivery for convenience stores and other small outlets, and food-service distributors for the food-service channel (schools, hospitals, restaurants). It is controlled by chairman and CEO Nick Caporella, who owns over 73% of the common stock.
Read more on FIZZ →Monster Beverage is a leader in the energy drink subsegment of the beverage industry. The Monster trademark anchors the portfolio, and notable offerings include Monster Energy and Monster Ultra. The firm has also started to incubate new trademarks for emerging enclaves of the energy space, like Reign in performance energy. It is primarily a brand owner, outsourcing most of its manufacturing processes to third-party copackers. It primarily uses the Coca-Cola bottling system for distribution after a strategic agreement in which Coke became Monster's largest shareholder (nearly 20%) and that also included the exchange of certain businesses between the two firms. Most of Monster's revenue is generated in the United States, though international geographies are increasing in the mix.
Read more on MNST →