Investment
Features
FeesSafety
Academy
More
Pluang+

Compare Fidelity National Information Servcs Inc (FIS) vs Monster Beverage Corp (MNST) Price & Performance

Fidelity National Information Servcs IncTrade
Monster Beverage CorpTrade

Price performance (Past 24H)

Key statistics

Fidelity National Information Servcs Inc vs Monster Beverage Corp — how do they compare? Fidelity National Information Servcs Inc trades at $42.6 (market cap $22.05B), while Monster Beverage Corp trades at $45.58 (market cap $89.20B). The key difference: Monster Beverage Corp is far larger — about 4× Fidelity National Information Servcs Inc's market cap, and Fidelity National Information Servcs Inc pays a 4.12% dividend while Monster Beverage Corp pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.

FISMNST
Market Cap
$22.05B$89.20B
Sector
TechnologyConsumer Staples
52-Week High
$72.77$49.97
52-Week Low
$37.72$30.86
Enterprise Value
$42.56B$87.49B
Dividend Yield
4.12%

Returns comparison

Trailing returns across standard periods

Top news

Latest headlines on both assets

About Fidelity National Information Servcs Inc

Fidelity National Information Services' legacy operations provide core and payment processing services to banks, but its business has expanded over time. By acquiring Sungard in 2015, the company now provides record-keeping and other services to investment firms. With the acquisition of Worldpay in 2019, FIS now provides payment processing services for merchants and holds leading positions in the United States and United Kingdom. About a fourth of revenue is generated outside North America.

Read more on FIS

About Monster Beverage Corp

Monster Beverage is a leader in the energy drink subsegment of the beverage industry. The Monster trademark anchors the portfolio, and notable offerings include Monster Energy and Monster Ultra. The firm has also started to incubate new trademarks for emerging enclaves of the energy space, like Reign in performance energy. It is primarily a brand owner, outsourcing most of its manufacturing processes to third-party copackers. It primarily uses the Coca-Cola bottling system for distribution after a strategic agreement in which Coke became Monster's largest shareholder (nearly 20%) and that also included the exchange of certain businesses between the two firms. Most of Monster's revenue is generated in the United States, though international geographies are increasing in the mix.

Read more on MNST