Compare FedEx Corporation (FDX) vs Hasbro, Inc. (HAS) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
FedEx Corporation vs Hasbro, Inc. — how do they compare? FedEx Corporation trades at $325.2 (market cap $76.28B), while Hasbro, Inc. trades at $95.27 (market cap $13.69B). The key difference: FedEx Corporation is far larger — about 5.6× Hasbro, Inc.'s market cap, and Hasbro, Inc. pays the higher dividend (2.89%). Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| FDX | HAS | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $76.28B | $13.69B |
Sector | Industrials | Consumer Cyclical |
52-Week High | $338.75 | $105.88 |
52-Week Low | $180.51 | $70.95 |
Enterprise Value | $105.91B | $15.88B |
Dividend Yield | 1.51% | 2.89% |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
FedEx (FDX) trades at $325.08, up 2.04% today, with a bullish technical signal and strong analyst support. Recent earnings beats and a consensus price target of $360.27 highlight positive momentum. The company's network transformation and focus on premium shipments are driving operational improvements, though revenue has been flat year-over-year. Cash flow trends show a projected rebound in 2026, with net cash flow turning positive.
The outlook for FDX is favorable, supported by cost-cutting initiatives and strategic shifts toward high-margin business. Key risks include competitive pressures and macroeconomic sensitivity. With 57% of analysts rating it a buy and institutional interest growing, the stock presents a compelling opportunity for growth-oriented investors, albeit with exposure to economic cycles.
Hasbro (HAS) trades at $94.49, up 1.04% today, with strong technical and fundamental momentum. The stock exhibits a bullish trend, supported by consecutive earnings beats in Q4 2025, Q1 2026, and Q2 2026. Recent news highlights growth in adult-focused segments like Magic: The Gathering, with Q2 2026 revenue up 16% year-over-year. Valuation metrics show a P/E of 17.27 and P/S of 2.77, while analyst consensus is bullish with a $104.90 price target.
The outlook for Hasbro is positive, driven by IP strength and digital gaming growth, but risks include margin pressures from tariffs and high debt levels. Institutional buying and a 51.52% buy rating from analysts support upside potential, though investors should monitor execution risks and macroeconomic headwinds. The stock's current price is within 5% of its 52-week high, indicating strong near-term momentum.
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
About FedEx Corporation
FedEx pioneered overnight delivery in 1973 and remains the world's largest express package provider. In its fiscal 2020 (ended May 2020), FedEx derived 51% of revenue from its express division, 33% from ground, and 10% from freight, its asset-based less-than-truckload shipping segment. The remainder comes from other services, including FedEx Office, which provides document production/shipping, and FedEx Logistics, which provides global forwarding. FedEx acquired Dutch parcel delivery firm TNT Express in 2016. TNT was previously the fourth-largest global parcel delivery provider.
Read more on FDX →About Hasbro, Inc.
Hasbro is a branded play company providing children and families around the world with entertainment offerings based on a world-class brand portfolio. From toys and games to television programming, motion pictures, and a licensing program, Hasbro reaches customers by leveraging its well-known brands such as Transformers, Nerf, and Magic: The Gathering. Ownership stakes in Discovery Family, which offers programming around Hasbro brands, and owned production capabilities from Entertainment One help bolster Hasbro's multichannel presence. The firm acquired Entertainment One in 2019, bolting on popular properties like Peppa Pig and PJ Masks, and has plans to tie up with Dungeons & Dragons Beyond in 2022, offering the firm access 10 million digital tabletop players.
Read more on HAS →
