iShares MSCI South Korea ETF vs iShares Global Clean Energy ETF — how do they compare? iShares MSCI South Korea ETF trades at $177 (market cap $26.25B), while iShares Global Clean Energy ETF trades at $17.2 (market cap $2.27B). The key difference: iShares MSCI South Korea ETF is far larger — about 11.6× iShares Global Clean Energy ETF's market cap, and iShares MSCI South Korea ETF is trading nearer its 52-week high, iShares Global Clean Energy ETF nearer its low. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold iShares MSCI South Korea ETF for 46 Days and iShares Global Clean Energy ETF for 87 Days on average.
| EWY | ICLN | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $26.25B | $2.27B |
Volume | 19,056,075 | 6,845,064 |
Sector | Broad Market / Factor | — |
52-Week High | $219.20 | $23.75 |
52-Week Low | $80.72 | $15.78 |
Typical Hold Time | 46 Days | 87 Days |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
EWY (iShares MSCI South Korea ETF) is trading at $176.77, down 3.78% amid broader Asian market pressures. The ETF shows a bearish technical signal with moving averages indicating selling pressure, though oversold RSI levels suggest potential near-term support. Recent volatility reflects sensitivity to semiconductor cycles, with heavy concentration in Samsung and SK hynix driving performance. South Korea's KOSPI has struggled to maintain gains above 7,000 despite AI-driven optimism, facing headwinds from rising oil prices and global bond yields.
The outlook remains tied to semiconductor demand and AI infrastructure spending, with corporate earnings showing resilience. Key risks include concentration in two holdings, memory cycle dependency, and macroeconomic pressures. Governance reforms and visible deleveraging provide fundamental support, but the ETF's high sensitivity to tech sector volatility warrants caution for risk-averse investors.
ICLN trades at $17.17, down 0.81% with bearish technical signals from moving averages. The ETF shows neutral momentum oscillators but faces significant volatility compared to traditional energy peers. Recent news highlights ICLN's 57.2% maximum drawdown and higher expense ratio of 0.38% versus fossil fuel ETFs, though geopolitical tensions are driving renewed interest in renewable energy infrastructure.
The clean energy sector faces competitive pressure from higher-yielding traditional energy ETFs, but long-term growth prospects remain supported by global energy transition trends. Key risks include expense ratio disadvantages and sector volatility, while potential catalysts include increased renewable adoption driven by geopolitical and environmental factors.
Trailing returns across standard periods
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
EWY tracks the MSCI Korea 25/50 Index, offering targeted exposure to large and mid-cap companies in South Korea. It is structurally centered on the global technology supply chain, industrials, and financial services, serving as a liquid tool for investors seeking a single-country view of this advanced, innovation-led economy.
Read more on EWY →The index is designed to track the performance of approximately 100 clean energy-related companies. The fund generally invests at least 80% of its assets in the component securities of the target index. The index may invest up to 20% of its assets in certain futures, trading options and swap contracts, cash and cash equivalents, as well as in securities not included in the index. It is non-diversified.
Read more on ICLN →