iShares MSCI Japan ETF vs Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF — how do they compare? iShares MSCI Japan ETF trades at $97.68 (market cap $23.87B), while Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF trades at $309.25 (market cap $113.40B). The key difference: Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF is far larger — about 4.8× iShares MSCI Japan ETF's market cap, and iShares MSCI Japan ETF is more actively traded (5,412,820 versus 2,866,236). Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold iShares MSCI Japan ETF for 56 Days and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF for 54 Days on average.
| EWJ | QQQM | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $23.87B | $113.40B |
Volume | 5,412,820 | 2,866,236 |
Sector | Broad Market / Factor | Broad Market / Factor |
52-Week High | $99.32 | $312.76 |
52-Week Low | $78.36 | $229.87 |
Typical Hold Time | 56 Days | 54 Days |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
EWJ, the iShares MSCI Japan ETF, trades at $97.44, down 0.9% on the day amid mixed technical signals. The ETF shows neutral momentum with RSI readings around 50 and faces immediate resistance at $98. Recent news highlights Japan's monetary policy uncertainty as the Bank of Japan navigates rate hikes while facing fiscal challenges and yen volatility.
The outlook remains balanced with international ETF performance showing strength but Japanese equities facing headwinds from rising yields and currency pressures. Key risks include BOJ policy missteps and global bond market volatility, while potential catalysts include sustained international diversification trends and yen stabilization efforts.
QQQM (Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF) trades at $309.27, down 0.88% on the day, with a bullish technical signal from moving averages. The ETF tracks the NASDAQ-100 index with a low 0.15% expense ratio. Recent institutional buying includes QRG Capital Management increasing its position by 207.5% during Q2 2026. Technical indicators show support at $305 and resistance at $311, with neutral oscillator readings suggesting balanced momentum.
The outlook remains positive given the NASDAQ-100's growth exposure and cost efficiency versus QQQ. Risks include market concentration in technology stocks and potential volatility from macroeconomic factors. Institutional accumulation and favorable expense structure support long-term positioning, though investors should monitor index composition changes and broader market trends.
Trailing returns across standard periods
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Latest headlines on both assets
EWJ tracks the MSCI Japan Index, providing broad exposure to over 180 large and mid-cap companies in Japan. It is the most established and liquid vehicle for accessing the Japanese equity market, featuring a diversified portfolio across industrials, consumer discretionary, and financial sectors.
Read more on EWJ →QQQM is an ETF designed to track the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It provides exposure to the 100 largest non-financial companies listed on the NASDAQ. Positioned as a lower-cost and more long-term-investor-friendly alternative to its peer QQQ, QQQM offers the same fundamental market exposure but typically has a lower share price and is structured to appeal to investors focused on accumulation rather than active trading.
Read more on QQQM →