Compare Essex Property Trust, Inc. (ESS) vs Monster Beverage Corp (MNST) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Essex Property Trust, Inc. vs Monster Beverage Corp — how do they compare? Essex Property Trust, Inc. trades at $269.13 (market cap $17.26B), while Monster Beverage Corp trades at $43.62 (market cap $85.51B). The key difference: Monster Beverage Corp is far larger — about 5× Essex Property Trust, Inc.'s market cap, and Essex Property Trust, Inc. pays a 3.86% dividend while Monster Beverage Corp pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Essex Property Trust, Inc. for 111 Days and Monster Beverage Corp for 72 Days on average.
| ESS | MNST | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $17.26B | $85.51B |
Volume | 454,464 | 8,569,709 |
Sector | Real Estate | Consumer Staples |
52-Week High | $298.33 | $49.97 |
52-Week Low | $239.61 | $33.16 |
Typical Hold Time | 111 Days | 72 Days |
Enterprise Value | $23.86B | $83.81B |
Dividend Yield | 3.86% | — |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
ESS trades at $268.05, down 1.63% on the day, with a bearish technical signal from moving averages but neutral oscillators. The company reported mixed quarterly earnings, missing in Q4 2025 and Q2 2026 but beating in Q1 2026, with Q3 2026 results pending. Revenue reached $1.89B in 2025, with a net income margin of 21.48%, while valuation ratios like a P/E of 41.83 suggest a premium. Recent news highlights strong Q2 2026 results, raised guidance, and a declared dividend of $2.59 per share.
The outlook is cautiously optimistic, supported by operational strength and resolved litigation, but high valuation and earnings volatility pose risks. Analyst consensus is a Buy with a $303.41 price target, indicating potential upside, though investors should monitor debt levels and consistent earnings delivery against expectations.
Monster Beverage (MNST) trades at $42.88, down 0.86% on the day, with technical indicators showing bearish momentum despite strong fundamental performance. The company reported robust Q2 2026 earnings, beating estimates with $0.30 EPS, and maintains impressive profitability metrics including 55.55% gross margin and 23.08% net income margin. Recent news highlights Monster's debt-free balance sheet and international expansion driving 35% overseas sales growth.
While valuation multiples appear elevated (P/E 39.7, P/S 9.18), Monster's consistent earnings beats and analyst consensus price target of $98.22 suggest significant upside potential. Key risks include regulatory challenges in international markets and competitive pressures, but the company's strong cash flow generation and market position support long-term growth prospects.
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
About Essex Property Trust, Inc.
Essex Property Trust owns a portfolio of 253 apartment communities with over 62,000 units and is developing three additional properties with 571 units. The company focuses on owning large, high-quality properties on the West Coast in the urban and suburban submarkets of Southern California, Northern California, and Seattle.
Read more on ESS →About Monster Beverage Corp
Monster Beverage is a leader in the energy drink subsegment of the beverage industry. The Monster trademark anchors the portfolio, and notable offerings include Monster Energy and Monster Ultra. The firm has also started to incubate new trademarks for emerging enclaves of the energy space, like Reign in performance energy. It is primarily a brand owner, outsourcing most of its manufacturing processes to third-party copackers. It primarily uses the Coca-Cola bottling system for distribution after a strategic agreement in which Coke became Monster's largest shareholder (nearly 20%) and that also included the exchange of certain businesses between the two firms. Most of Monster's revenue is generated in the United States, though international geographies are increasing in the mix.
Read more on MNST →
