Compare EPAM Systems Inc (EPAM) vs Wells Fargo & Co (WFC) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
EPAM Systems Inc vs Wells Fargo & Co — how do they compare? EPAM Systems Inc trades at $113.91 (market cap $5.87B), while Wells Fargo & Co trades at $81.8 (market cap $248.06B). The key difference: Wells Fargo & Co is far larger — about 42.3× EPAM Systems Inc's market cap, and Wells Fargo & Co pays a 2.44% dividend while EPAM Systems Inc pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold EPAM Systems Inc for 37 Days and Wells Fargo & Co for 87 Days on average.
| EPAM | WFC | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $5.87B | $248.06B |
Volume | 847,420 | 16,615,741 |
Sector | Technology | Financials |
52-Week High | $221.40 | $96.40 |
52-Week Low | $76.04 | $73.42 |
Typical Hold Time | 37 Days | 87 Days |
Enterprise Value | $5.24B | $503.91B |
Dividend Yield | — | 2.44% |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
EPAM trades at $108.32, down 0.91% on the day, with a bearish technical signal but solid fundamentals including a P/E of 15.45 and three consecutive quarterly EPS beats. Revenue grew to $5.46B in 2025, though net income margin compressed to 6.92%. Recent news highlights AI-native revenue growth exceeding 11% and activist investor Engine Capital urging a $750M share buyback.
The stock appears undervalued with a consensus price target of $119, offering ~10% upside, but faces near-term headwinds from slower North American growth and AI disruption to legacy services. Investor sentiment is mixed, balancing strong analyst support (59% buy ratings) against technical weakness and competitive pressures.
Wells Fargo (WFC) trades at $80.26, down 1.53% today, with a bearish technical signal despite recent earnings beat in Q2 2026. The company shows strong fundamentals with a P/E of 11.92, net income margin of 25.97%, and a recent credit rating upgrade to 'A-' by S&P (Zacks Investment Research, 2026-10-01). Revenue growth is steady, reaching $83.70B in 2025, with a consensus price target of $99.13 suggesting upside potential.
The stock presents a value opportunity with attractive valuation metrics and improving profitability, but faces risks from volatile cash flows and regulatory changes in bank stress tests. Analyst sentiment is mixed with 46.66% buy ratings, while technical indicators signal near-term caution. Upside hinges on Q3 2026 earnings meeting expectations of $1.85 EPS.
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
About EPAM Systems Inc
EPAM Systems Inc provides software product development and digital platform engineering services to clients located around the world. The company services include Software Product Development, Custom Application Development, Application Testing, Enterprise Application Platforms, Application Maintenance, and Support and Infrastructure Management. The company focuses on innovative and scalable software solutions. The company uses industry standard and custom developed technology, tools, and platforms to deliver results to handle business challenges. The company primarily offers its solutions in the following industries: financial services, travel and consumer, software and hi-tech, life sciences and healthcare. The majority of revenue is generated from North American clients.
Read more on EPAM →About Wells Fargo & Co
Wells Fargo is one of the largest banks in the United States, with approximately $1.9 trillion in balance sheet assets. The company is split into four primary segments: consumer banking, commercial banking, corporate and investment banking, and wealth and investment management. It is almost entirely focused on the U.S.
Read more on WFC →
