Investment
Features
FeesSafety
Academy
More
Pluang+

Compare EPAM Systems Inc (EPAM) vs Unilever plc (UL) Price & Performance

EPAM Systems IncTrade
Unilever plcTrade

Price performance (Past 24H)

Key statistics

EPAM Systems Inc vs Unilever plc — how do they compare? EPAM Systems Inc trades at $113.91 (market cap $5.87B), while Unilever plc trades at $61.66 (market cap $131.63B). The key difference: Unilever plc is far larger — about 22.4× EPAM Systems Inc's market cap, and Unilever plc pays a 3.43% dividend while EPAM Systems Inc pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold EPAM Systems Inc for 37 Days and Unilever plc for 112 Days on average.

EPAMUL
Market Cap
$5.87B$131.63B
Volume
847,4202,978,741
Sector
TechnologyConsumer Staples
52-Week High
$221.40$74.59
52-Week Low
$76.04$55.05
Typical Hold Time
37 Days112 Days
Enterprise Value
$5.24B$156.65B
Dividend Yield
—3.43%

Aura AI Summary

Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice

EPAM Systems Inc

EPAM trades at $108.32, down 0.91% on the day, with a bearish technical signal but solid fundamentals including a P/E of 15.45 and three consecutive quarterly EPS beats. Revenue grew to $5.46B in 2025, though net income margin compressed to 6.92%. Recent news highlights AI-native revenue growth exceeding 11% and activist investor Engine Capital urging a $750M share buyback.

The stock appears undervalued with a consensus price target of $119, offering ~10% upside, but faces near-term headwinds from slower North American growth and AI disruption to legacy services. Investor sentiment is mixed, balancing strong analyst support (59% buy ratings) against technical weakness and competitive pressures.

Unilever plc

Unilever (UL) trades at $60.98, up 0.3% on the day, amid a bearish technical signal and mixed earnings performance. The company reported Q2 2026 EPS of $1.83, narrowly missing the $1.84 estimate, continuing a trend of recent misses. Financially, UL maintains strong profitability with an 18.32% net income margin and 54.56% ROE, though revenue declined to $50.5B in 2025. Analyst sentiment is divided with a Hold consensus, while news highlights strategic shifts including the planned food business merger with McCormick.

The outlook balances high profitability and emerging market exposure against execution risks from portfolio restructuring and recent earnings misses. The stock's valuation at a P/E of 21.32 appears reasonable relative to historical margins, but investor caution is warranted given the bearish technical trend and regulatory scrutiny of the McCormick deal. Upside potential hinges on successful integration and volume growth sustainability.

Returns comparison

Trailing returns across standard periods

Investor sentiment on Pluang

What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days

EPAM
46% Buy54% Sell
Avg holding period · 37 Days
UL
0% Buy100% Sell
Avg holding period · 112 Days

Top news

Latest headlines on both assets

About EPAM Systems Inc

EPAM Systems Inc provides software product development and digital platform engineering services to clients located around the world. The company services include Software Product Development, Custom Application Development, Application Testing, Enterprise Application Platforms, Application Maintenance, and Support and Infrastructure Management. The company focuses on innovative and scalable software solutions. The company uses industry standard and custom developed technology, tools, and platforms to deliver results to handle business challenges. The company primarily offers its solutions in the following industries: financial services, travel and consumer, software and hi-tech, life sciences and healthcare. The majority of revenue is generated from North American clients.

Read more on EPAM →

About Unilever plc

Unilever is a diversified personal product (42% of 2021 sales by value), home care (20%), and packaged food (38%) company. Its brands include Knorr soups and sauces, Hellmann's mayonnaise, Lipton teas, Axe and Dove skin products, and the TRESemme haircare brand. The firm has been acquisitive in recent years

Read more on UL →