Compare EPAM Systems Inc (EPAM) vs Under Armour Inc Class A (UA) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
EPAM Systems Inc vs Under Armour Inc Class A — how do they compare? EPAM Systems Inc trades at $113.24 (market cap $5.87B), while Under Armour Inc Class A trades at $4.78 (market cap $2.07B). The key difference: EPAM Systems Inc is far larger — about 2.8× Under Armour Inc Class A's market cap, and EPAM Systems Inc is more actively traded (847,420 versus 2,680,141). Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold EPAM Systems Inc for 37 Days and Under Armour Inc Class A for 18 Days on average.
| EPAM | UA | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $5.87B | $2.07B |
Volume | 847,420 | 2,680,141 |
Sector | Technology | Consumer Cyclical |
52-Week High | $221.40 | $7.88 |
52-Week Low | $76.04 | $3.96 |
Typical Hold Time | 37 Days | 18 Days |
Enterprise Value | $5.24B | $3.05B |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
EPAM Systems trades at $113.86, up 5.11% today, with strong technical momentum as the stock approaches resistance near $115. The company has consistently beaten earnings estimates in recent quarters, with Q3 2026 results pending. Revenue grew to $5.46B in 2025, though net margins compressed to 6.92%. Recent news highlights EPAM's cloud infrastructure achievements and activist investor pressure for share buybacks.
The outlook remains cautiously optimistic with a consensus price target of $119 offering 4.5% upside. Key risks include North American growth slowdown and AI disruption to legacy services. Analyst sentiment is predominantly bullish (59% Buy ratings), but investors should monitor Q3 earnings and management's response to shareholder value concerns.
Under Armour (UA) trades at $4.78, up 1.7% with a bullish technical signal despite negative profitability metrics. The company reported mixed quarterly results with two beats and one miss, while revenue declined to $4.9B in 2026 with a net loss of $492M. Analyst consensus shows 40% buy ratings but sentiment remains cautious due to ongoing revenue challenges and negative cash flow trends.
The outlook remains challenging with declining revenue and persistent losses, though the stock's low P/S ratio of 0.41 offers valuation support. Key risks include weak North American demand and competitive pressures, while potential catalysts require successful execution of turnaround strategies to restore profitability.
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
No sentiment data available yet.
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
About EPAM Systems Inc
EPAM Systems Inc provides software product development and digital platform engineering services to clients located around the world. The company services include Software Product Development, Custom Application Development, Application Testing, Enterprise Application Platforms, Application Maintenance, and Support and Infrastructure Management. The company focuses on innovative and scalable software solutions. The company uses industry standard and custom developed technology, tools, and platforms to deliver results to handle business challenges. The company primarily offers its solutions in the following industries: financial services, travel and consumer, software and hi-tech, life sciences and healthcare. The majority of revenue is generated from North American clients.
Read more on EPAM →About Under Armour Inc Class A
Under Armour is a leading inventor, marketer, and distributor of branded athletic performance apparel, footwear, and accessories. Built on the 'technical' performance of synthetic fabrics, the company is currently undergoing a multi-year brand evolution centered on premium product innovation, operational rigor, and a renewed focus on its North American core under the guidance of founder Kevin Plank.
Read more on UA →
