Compare Estee Lauder Companies Inc (EL) vs Under Armour Inc Class A (UA) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Estee Lauder Companies Inc vs Under Armour Inc Class A — how do they compare? Estee Lauder Companies Inc trades at $93.84 (market cap $34.22B), while Under Armour Inc Class A trades at $4.74 (market cap $2.05B). The key difference: Estee Lauder Companies Inc is far larger — about 16.7× Under Armour Inc Class A's market cap, and Estee Lauder Companies Inc pays a 1.48% dividend while Under Armour Inc Class A pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Estee Lauder Companies Inc for 122 Days and Under Armour Inc Class A for 18 Days on average.
| EL | UA | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $34.22B | $2.05B |
Volume | 2,303,792 | 3,002,780 |
Sector | Consumer Staples | Consumer Cyclical |
52-Week High | $119.61 | $7.88 |
52-Week Low | $67.23 | $3.96 |
Typical Hold Time | 122 Days | 18 Days |
Enterprise Value | $39.97B | $3.03B |
Dividend Yield | 1.48% | — |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Estée Lauder (EL) trades at $94.32, up 1.03% today, with a bullish technical signal from moving averages and recent earnings beats. The company reported a net loss of $1.13 billion in 2025 despite a high gross margin of 75.5%, while 2026 forecasts show a return to profitability. Analysts maintain a consensus buy rating with a $103 price target, supported by strategic partnerships in AI and leadership changes aimed at driving growth.
The stock's outlook is cautiously optimistic, with earnings recovery and digital initiatives offering upside, but high debt levels and margin pressures pose risks. Investor sentiment is mixed amid volatile cash flows and competitive headwinds in the beauty sector.
Under Armour (UA) trades at $4.70, down 0.42% with a bearish technical outlook despite recent earnings beats. The company faces significant challenges with negative net income margins (-9.99%) and declining revenue trends, though it maintains a reasonable P/S ratio of 0.41. Recent quarterly results show mixed performance with two beats and one miss, while cash flow remains negative across all categories.
The stock presents high risk with deteriorating fundamentals and negative profitability metrics. While analyst sentiment leans slightly positive with 41% buy ratings, the company's revenue declines and negative cash flow position create substantial headwinds. Investment opportunity exists only for those betting on a successful turnaround strategy execution.
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
No sentiment data available yet.
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
About Estee Lauder Companies Inc
Estee Lauder is the world leader in the global prestige beauty market, participating across skincare (56% of fiscal 2022 sales), makeup (26%), fragrance (14%), and haircare (4%) categories, with popular brands such as Estee Lauder, Clinique, MAC, La Mer, Jo Malone, Aveda, Bobbi Brown, Too Faced, Origins, Dr. Jart+, and The Ordinary. The firm operates in 150 countries, with 26% of fiscal 2022 revenue stemming from the Americas, 43% from Europe, the Middle East, and Africa, and 31% from Asia-Pacific. The company sells its products through department stores, travel retail, multi-brand specialty beauty stores, brand-dedicated freestanding stores, e-commerce, salons/spas, and perfumeries.
Read more on EL →About Under Armour Inc Class A
Under Armour is a leading inventor, marketer, and distributor of branded athletic performance apparel, footwear, and accessories. Built on the 'technical' performance of synthetic fabrics, the company is currently undergoing a multi-year brand evolution centered on premium product innovation, operational rigor, and a renewed focus on its North American core under the guidance of founder Kevin Plank.
Read more on UA →
